Laserfiche WebLink
based on the potentiometric elevation of the presumed highest source of mine inflow. <br />The portals aze approximately 75 ft. than higher than 7350 ft.; therefore, the mine will not <br />discharge water to the ground surface from the portals. <br />The regional aquifers, Tow Creek and Trout Creek sandstones, will not be affected by the <br />Apex No. 2 Mine; the Tow Creek is a few hundred feet below the mine workings, and the <br />Twentymile is several hundred feet higher in the stratigraphic section. <br />The only bedrock aquifer that could be affected by the Apex Mine is a sandstone bed in <br />the basal Williams Fork aquifer. The basal Williams Fork aquifer was defined by Robson <br />and Stewart (1990, USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4020, page 54). <br />Domestic wells yielding less than 10 gpm have been developed in this aquifer near the <br />Apex Mine, but no wells have been completed in the specific sandstone bed that could <br />potentially be affected by the Apex No. 2 Mine. <br />The basal Williams Fork sandstone bed is approximately 40 feet thick and is about 90 <br />feet above the lower Pinnacle coats. The sandstone bed probably is low porosity based on <br />the absence of a density anomaly on the density log. Drilling depth from the ground <br />surface to this sandstone bed would be at least 450 feet at the northeast end of the Apex <br />No. 2's workings. At that location, the workings extend across a fault, a few feet into the <br />sandstone bed. The fault has juxataposed the sandstone bed against the Pinnacle coal at <br />that location. <br />A plume of mine water may form in the basal Williams Fork sandstone bed down-gradient <br />from the none's workings as described on pages 190.3 and 190.4 of the permit application. <br />The plume could possibly occupy an 8-acre azea. The plume probably would take a few <br />hundred years to develop owing to the low permeability of the sandstone. The water quality <br />of the plume would probably be no worse than the ambient quality of ground water in the <br />sandstone. The plume would constitute a minor hydrologic impact, and would not result in <br />material damage. <br />The mine does not dischazge to alluvial ground water. Ground water in Trout Creek alluvium <br />has commonly exceeded iron and manganese table values for agricultural use, but the <br />exceedances occur both in the upstream and the downstream monitoring wells, thus <br />indicating mining is not the cause. Other pazameters have not been exceeded in the <br />downstream alluvial well. <br />Colorado's Basic Standards for Ground Water aze set forth in Section 41.S.C.6 of the <br />regulations of the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission. The standard that is <br />applicable at the Apex Mine is the less restrictive of either the 1994 ambient quality, or the <br />table values listed in the regulation. In either case, the Apex Mine complies. Bedrock <br />ground water can be expected to have only the minor impact described above. Alluvial <br />ground water has shown no impacts, also as described above. <br />Apex No. 2 Mine Page 12 January 24, 2003 <br />Phases I, II, and III Bond Release <br />