Laserfiche WebLink
y . , ,.` ~ .. .. <br />' • 1 ~Y <br />Case No .' M75-1 ~ •, ~ ~ " <br />Cooley Gravel Company <br />Amended Resolution <br />2. ,.That Cooley Gravel Company is the fee simple <br />owner of the property to be mined. <br />3. That the Denver Mountain Parks property and the <br />Mt. Falcon Park property are surrounding land uses <br />• which could be affected by the mining operation; <br />however, neither has expressed oBjection. <br />4. That based on existing fencing and warning signs <br />posted at the boundaries between the quarry and <br />the surrounding public park lands, the applicant <br />• has taken reasonable safety precautions t0. keep <br />the public out of the quarry area. <br />5. .That based on blasting conducted by the applicant <br />over the past 5 years, inc.7uding the experimental <br />shot which contained 10,450 pounds, there is a <br />high probability that no surrounding land use will <br />~.be adversely affected by any blasting at the quarry <br />so long as each delay does not exceed 6,000 pounds, <br />' which is the maximum shot used by the applicant. <br />6.' That based on the drainage report prepared by the <br /> Leonard Rice Consulting Engineers, Inc., the pre- <br /> sent drainage plan employed by the appli cant is <br />„ adequate for a few years to come, but in the future, <br />' the drainage will have to be modified in accordance <br /> with the Leonard Rice Recommendations. <br />7. That based on testimony presented by the applicant's <br /> witnesses, it is possible to reclaim the exposed <br /> .-benches as mining is completed in progre ssive stages. <br />8. That the top 3 benches at elevations of 6,865 feet, <br /> •, 6,945 feet and 7,025 feet can be seen fr om the east•• <br /> ern plains areas. <br />9. .Ingress, egress and haul route plans are in compli- <br /> an~e with State and County regulations. <br />10. Emergency access to and from the quarry is acceptable. <br />11. The distance from the outer limits of the quarry op- <br />eration to the adjacent land boundaries is within the <br />. '. acceptable limits set forth in the Jefferson County <br />+Zoning Resolution for purposes of safety. <br />12. There are no apparent historical, geological or arch- <br />aeological sites present which would be jeopardized <br />by the quarry operation. <br />13. That measures taken to control wind erosion, fugitive <br />dust, airborne noise not due to blasting, airborne. <br />~~ noise. due to blasting and ground motion due to blast-, <br />ing as indicated in the Cooley Gravel Company repor•t5 <br />are acceptable.. <br />14. The quarry has been in operation 'at the subject loca- <br />tion for the past 5 years and there have been no pro- <br />tests or objections expressed during that time. <br />15: That based on the past 5 .years experience, there is a <br />demand and need for the app7icant'.s products. <br /> <br />' -p_ <br />