My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL38988
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL38988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:34 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:56:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/29/1994
Doc Name
CRESSON PROJECT PN M-80-244 COMMITMENT 33 SPECIFICATIONS GRADATION SPECIFICATION MODIFICATION OF SOI
From
CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINING CO
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />retained on the 1" screen and may not have been larger than 1'fz inches -then: was no 1~/z inch <br />screen in use at the time.). <br />To demonstrate the effect of the oversize material in the soil liner fill on permeability, liner test <br />fills were constructed and in-situ permeability tests were performed. The permeability tests were <br />performed using a sealed single ring infiltrometer ("SSRI"). The SSRI, as you know, is <br />commonly used to measure in-situ permeability. Three test fills were constructed using the same <br />equipment that will be used during full scale construction of the soil liner at tte leach pad. The <br />first test fill was constructed with a combination of material that had been processed through the <br />pug mill and borrowed from the unprocessed stockpile. The pug mill was the first attempt to <br />process the tailing which proved unsuccessful. The pug has since been demobilized from the <br />site and replaced with a screening plant. The second and third pads were constructed with <br />material that had been processed through the screening plant. The third pacl was constructed <br />because the second pad had been consumed by attempts to successfully seat the SSRI. <br />The coefficients of permeability for the five tests are summarized in Table 1..Four "acceptable" <br />permeability tests were performed on the three test fills. The results of perm;ability Tests No. <br />1,2,3, and 5 give a range of permeability values that are consistent (Table 1). However, the <br />coefficient of permeability ("k") calculated from data collected during Test N~~. 4 indicated that <br />"k" was two orders of magnitude higher than any other test result. The soils technician who <br />performed the test believes the SSRI may have been leaking around the base. (Four additional <br />SSRI tests were attempted on the three pads but were unsuccessful as the seal between the soil <br />and the bottom of the ring failed during the test.) <br />TABLE 1. Coefficients of Permeability <br />TEST NO. COEFFICIENT OF <br />PERMEABILI'''Y <br />(k) cm/sec <br />1 1.9 x 10-8 <br />2 7.8 x 10.9 <br />3 1.4 x 10-8 <br />4' 2.4 x 105 <br />5 1.1 x 10-8 <br />' Test data not used because SSRI appeared to be leaking around base. <br />The geometric mean of the four "acceptable" tests is 1.2 x 10-8 cm/sec. Tie subject permit <br />requires that the Ironclad soil liner must be constructed from materials that achieve a coefficient <br />of permeability of less than 1 x l0a cm/sec. Thus the tests demonstrate aln•ost two orders of <br />magnitude lower permeability than required by the approved specifications. The data collection <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.