Laserfiche WebLink
-26- <br />Perennial streams, however, may experience significant depletions of <br />flow if mine workings are extended adjacent to and/or below the level of <br />the stream valley (e.g., the bedrock alluvial contact). The lower <br />stream gradient and the thicker alluvial deposits in perennial stream <br />valleys favor flow retention and recharge to the ground water systems. <br />Due to the increased flow retention and ground water recharge in <br />perennial stream valleys, there is a greater potential for stream <br />depletions by mining adjacent to or under these stream valleys. Amine <br />in these areas could generate depletions by increasing mine inflows in <br />the area. These mine inflows could be induced either through the mine <br />workings encountering existing faults or fractures or strata recharged <br />by the stream, or through the mine producing subsidence fractures which <br />extend to the stream valley bottom or to rock strata recharged by the <br />stream. <br />Only one mining operation, Dorchester No. 1, will undermine a perennial <br />drainage. The quantity of flow may be depleted in Newlin Creek through <br />the dewatering of faults, fractures and rock strata which are in direct <br />or indirect communication with the alluvium or stream bottom. <br />The Dorchester No. 1 Mine has recently mined beneath Newlin Creek. <br />Inspection of the underground workings by CMLRD personnel showed this <br />portion of the mine to be making measurable amounts of water. At the <br />present a quantitative estimate of depletion is not available. Future <br />monitoring will provide data. However, since Newlin Creek is usually <br />diverted by the town of Florence above the existing permitted mines, <br />cummulative impacts to Newlin Creek are considered small. <br />In summary, it is unlikely that the current and proposed mining activities, <br />will significantly impact the natural hydrologic balance beyond background <br />levels produced by previous mining activities except in localized areas. <br />Because of the lack of pre-mining hydrologic data, it is difficult to quantify <br />the magnitude of the impact that has already occurred. However, if adequate <br />hydrologic monitoring is carried out, a better understanding of impacts due to <br />the current and proposed mining operations will result. During the Permanent <br />Program permitting process, all of the active mines will be required to <br />implement adequate hydrologic monitoring programs. This will better enable <br />the Division to make the required hydrologic regulatory decisions for future <br />mining proposals <br />An assessment of the probable hydrologic consequences of the proposed mining <br />operation and an assessment of the probable cumulative impact of all <br />anticipated mining in the general area on the hydrologic balance have been <br />made. Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(c), the Division finds that the operation has <br />been designed to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the <br />proposed permit boundary. <br />IX. Climatological/Information and Air Resources - Rul <br />Climatological data, as given in Section 2.04.8 of Volume I, pages 97 through <br />121 of the application and page 19 of Volume II of the 2nd Adequacy Response, <br />has been reviewed by the Division. <br />