Laserfiche WebLink
_pl_ <br />C. Impacts on Ground Water <br />The Dorchester No. 1 mine workings have the potential to deplete the quantity <br />of ground water through mine-induced ground water inflows. The mining <br />operation will induce inflows by dewatering the coal seam and the associated <br />roof and floor strata as the mine workings advance. In addition, overlying <br />aquifers could be dewatered through subsidence-related fractures. Locally <br />perched ground water aquifers in strata above the workings may be dewatered <br />through subsidence cracks or fractures. Thus the water will drain down <br />through the fractures to the voids created by the mine. <br />The greatest potential effect on ground water is for perched aquifers in the <br />Vermejo and the overlying Raton Formations to be dewatered by subsidence. <br />Wells which use these perched aquifers could experience some drawdown effects. <br />However, due to the transmissivity of the aquifer, the fact that aquifers in <br />this area tend to be laterally discontinuous, and the effects of past surface <br />and underground mining, ground water impacts (both magnitude and extent) are <br />difficult to predict. The operator is obligated to comply with Rule 4.05.15 <br />pertaining to water rights and replacement if an owner is injured as the <br />result of the operation. The ground water monitoring plan has been designed to <br />identify ground water impacts before they extend to water supply wells. these <br />measures will ensure a better understanding of the impacts to the ground water <br />system and protection of water resources in the future. <br />The existence of the mine workings will permanently modify the pattern of <br />ground water flow. The flooded mine constitutes a region of essentially <br />infinite permeability that will tend to cause ground water to preferentially <br />pass through the workings. The water passing through the flooded mine may be <br />degraded in quality, relative to that in the undisturbed strata. <br />Another potential ground water impact due to subsidence would be <br />fracture-related drainage of surface water bodies. These surface water bodies <br />would be the mine water ponds, ephemeral drainages, and the perennial Newlin <br />Creek. Dewatering the ponds would short-circuit the water system during <br />mining, which is not considered a significant impact. Also, the effects to <br />ephemeral drainages would be minimal. However, diverting streamflow of Newlin <br />Creek underground might be significant. The interception of surface water or <br />shallow ground water by underground workings presents a potential impact to <br />water availability to the Newlin Creek. However, as previously mentioned, <br />Newlin Creek is diverted upstream of the mine by the city of Florence. This <br />reduces the significance of any depletions to the creek by the mine. <br />The mine is presently incurring water sources in both the north sections and <br />the southern sections of the mine. No quantitative studies have been <br />undertaken to date. Quantification of total depletions to Newlin Creek are <br />nearly impossible to make, since mining adjacent to this creek was primarily <br />done from late 1900 through the 1970's. Most of these areas have been sealed <br />off and, therefore, could not indicate reliable inflows. However, the mine <br />inflow study to be conducted by the operator will provide valuable data in the <br />future in impacts from the Dorchester operation. <br />