Laserfiche WebLink
p <br />concluded that the previous decision of the CMLRD to ware the woody plant <br />density requirement can be considered to constitute a 'de facto' change in land ,. \ P~ <br />use. Species diversity is not a requirement on cropland or pasture land areas. W" <br />There are no mines in Colorado that has been given a variance on ~~ , <br />reestablishment of woody plant density that retain a species diversity "`, _ n C <br />requirement. Therefore, it is important that the CMLRD consider the implications ly`~ <br />of the previous decision on woody plant density standards and also waWe the <br />species diversity standard to maintain consistency relative to evaluation of <br />woody plant success. <br />20 <br />