Laserfiche WebLink
Rug 31 2006 12:12 HP LRSERJET FRX p•2 <br />August 31, 2006 <br />Colorado State Division of Mineral & <br />ATTN: Carl Mount <br />1313 Sherman St, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Permit <br />-I6~ <br />Confidental?: n10 <br />RE: Permit # M1983102 <br />Dear Mr. Mount: <br />Doc. Name: x C <br />Doc. Date (if no date <br />Specialist: P~uu~. <br />N <br />This letter is from a majority of the extremely concerned residences of Great Divide Head Lettuce <br />Subdivision who reside East of County Road 61 and are impacted by Permit #M1983102 presently <br />listed under Thompson Properties. We are requesting an immediate inspection of the above property. <br />We strongly believe and fear that the gravel operation has entered the water table. We also believe the <br />site is unsafe and being run without concern for water issues or safety of the slope being mined. <br />Our understanding is the slope should be at 5 to 1 except for the east side being 3 to 1. According to <br />our understanding of the slope we believe the slope is approx 2 to 1 AT BEST. Due to a recent <br />rezoning to expand the existing gravel mining operation requested by Thompson Properties for <br />Residential Tracks 5 and 6 of Great Divide Head Lettuce Subdivision to Forestry and Open allowed by <br />two Board of County Commissioners (after the County Planning Director and Planning Commission <br />unanimously opposed the rezoning due to the residential character of the neighborhood which was well <br />established prior to the Thompson's purchasing the property) our concerns were even more elevated. <br />Our BIGCrEST and most disturbing concerns are the ponds at the current mining operation. Attached <br />to this letter are pictures of the ponds. Emails will follow from our neighborhood spokespersons. The <br />pictures clearly show that on one water feature they have built a barge and put a pump on it to pump <br />water out. The others have pumps and trucks backed up to them indicating they are removing water <br />that they do not own or have a state issued well permit for. The permit from the state indicates there <br />should be no ground water. One pond has asphalt in the water and it appears they have tried to cover <br />up the water or bury the water with asphalt. Furthermore, in Grand Couuty Board of <br />Commissioner minutes from an August 15, 2006 public hearing of the rezoning and discussion of <br />the existing gravel operation and proposed re-location/eapanaion, Sam Conger of Flat Workin <br />stated emphatically that a picture of standing wafer on the present site was rain water drained <br />off the floor of the pit to make it safe. Also, included are newspaper articles stating that the <br />water at the current gravel pit is snow melt and run off. This is hard to believe considering it is <br />now August. <br />The adjacent neighbors have all hit water at 60 feet for wells and most pumps are set between 70 and <br />80 feet. This is also another indication that they have hit the water table and are affecting the <br />neighboring wells. <br />A concrete plant is also being operated at the mine and it is our understanding it has a 10,000 gallon <br />water storage tank under the building for water. Where is this water coming from? -The mine site is <br />NOT on county or town water. <br />