My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL38613
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL38613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:19 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:46:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/10/1996
Doc Name
WATER STORAGE CAPACITY FOR MODIFIED TAILINGS POND AND HAZEL A PN M-94-117-COM INC
From
FOX
To
DNR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~~~.;~~ III <br />January 9, 1996 <br />rrcr~l\/F~~ <br />JAN 10 1991; <br />Mr. Allen C. Sorenson <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street Rm. 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Water Storage Capac;ty fer,l~lodr~~ed Tailings Pond and Hazel A <br />Permit No. M-94-117, COMInc: <br />Al: <br />Division of ~wmerais 8 Geo~oyy <br />The following chart and table were developed Gom the tailings pond survey that was completed <br />on December 21, 1995. The pond points were shot using a theodolite and stadia, shooting level <br />shots. A map of the tailings pond showing the contours and survey shot locations is attached. <br />The total volume above the current surface level of the tailings and ice is 0.52 ace-feet to the <br />decant risers and 0.76 acre-feet to the low point on the embankmrnt. There is also an estimated <br />volume of 0.12 acre-feet of water storage volume from the low point of the tailings to the top of <br />the ice. With this extra 0.12acre-feet of capacity, the dry pond volume is 0.64 acre-feet to the <br />riser inlet and 0.88 acre feet to the top of the embankmrnt. <br />These aze two reasons that the capacity of the pond is lower than the estimated volume shown in <br />my letter of December 18, 1995. <br />1) The pond azea is smaller than the area of Matit Stern's original pond design map. <br />2) After my survey of the embankment last summer to make slue that there was two feet <br />of fill added to the embenlanent, additional work on the embenlmtent was done to <br />add additional material on the downstream side of the embankment The additional <br />material was placer! to allow erc•.:glt room for fence post installation after an anchor <br />trench was made. The additional equipment travel on the emberilaarnt probably <br />compacted the material more and deceased the effective height of the fill. <br />My December 18 letter to you calculated the stonnwater nmoff into the pond from the 100-year, <br />24 hour storm to be 0.45 acre-feet. The survey shows that the incremental storage capacity <br />currently in the pond to the decant risers (0.52 acre-feet) can contain this storm event with more <br />than a l 5°io surplus. Your permit adequacy letter dated June 25, 1995 (Item 2), said that this <br />storage capacity would be acceptable prior to construction of the penttanent dam raise with <br />continuing use of the Haul A decant system. Below, I have calculated the curent storage <br />capacity behind the Hazel A bulkhead to be an additional 0.148 acre-feet. I also estitnete that the <br />water and ice in the pond occupy 0.12 acre-feet. Therefore, the total dry capacity of the pond and <br />the Hazel A storage is 0.788 ace-feet to the decant risers, compared to 0.45 acre-feet runoff from <br />the 100-year, 24hour storm. <br />illlllliiiill 111 ., "~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.