Laserfiche WebLink
C. Ingestion of Contaminated Vegetation <br />There is no crop production at the nearest feasible <br />residence, thereby eliminating this pathway from further <br />consideration. <br />D. Ingestion of Meat or Milk Grazed on Contemir,ated <br />Vegetation <br />There are no livestock grazed and/or used for meat or milk <br />consumption at this residence. There are livestock grazed in <br />the irrunediate vicinity of the ore tr,a,sfe•, 1~~,1. In,t tL~: <br />nearest resident does not consume meat ur milk tom that <br />source. This pathway has not been consrd~rr~•J ii, the ~I„se <br />assessment. <br />E. Ingestion of Contaminated Water <br />Groundwater is used for drinkiny purposes (well records <br />indicate a well of 410 foot depth with water level at 238 <br />feet); however, since the residence is 900 feet in elevation <br />above the licensed facilities, there is no impact from the <br />licensed facilities on this pathway. <br />F. Ingestion of Meat or Milk from Stock Watered on <br />Contaminated Water <br />Consistent with remarks from D and E above, and because there <br />is no surface water at the residence, this pathway has not <br />been considered in the dose assessment. <br />V. DOSE ANALYSIS <br />A. Inhalation <br />Airborne radionuclide particulate monitoring was conducted <br />throughout the six month perio~3 at sampling location 205. <br />Background concentrations from data collected at location 206 <br />were subtracted from data collected at location 205 to <br />determine airborne exposure concentrations attributable to <br />the licensed facilities. The subtraction of background data <br />from location 205 monitoring data yielded airborne exposure <br />concentrations attributable to the licensed facilities of <br />less than zero for this pathway. <br />B. Other Pathways <br />Section IV discusses tl,e reasons Eor elimination of otter <br />pathways from consideration. <br />