My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-05-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1983141
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1983141
>
1992-05-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1983141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2021 8:03:24 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:38:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983141
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/28/1992
From
GOLD HILL VENTURES
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • G �!� <br /> 999 1 ] <br /> GOLD HILL VENTURES <br /> P.O. Box 1523 4AY 2 8 Ift <br /> Boulder, Colorado 80502 Mined <br /> Cana <br /> Reclamation <br /> Attn: Mr. William C. York-Feirn May 28, 1992 <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Division <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Dear Mr. York-Feirn, <br /> This letter is written in response to the letter that Mr. Evan Freirich addressed to you <br /> on March 20, 1992. In his letter, Mr. Freirich referred to unpermitted water discharges from <br /> the Cash mine into the drainage which flows through Summerville where he resides. Mr. <br /> Freirich contended that he and several of his neighbors, "have observed unusually high levels <br /> of water in the creek which lies below and is directly fed by the drainage of the Cash <br /> operation." He further stated, "This creek is seasonal and is usually dry." And, "Specifically <br /> on or about July 1st and October 25 there was (sic) unusually high levels of water in the <br /> creek." Mr. Freirich imparted his observation that, "generally there has been water in the <br /> creek most of the Summer and Fall" and that the water "tended to flow in the mornings while <br /> being dry in the afternoons." He authoritatively asserted that, "This would tend to rule out <br /> natural drainage." <br /> I would like to state in the strongest terms possible that Gold Hill Ventures has not <br /> been discharging Cash mine water into Cash Gulch. All of the water that has been pumped <br /> from the upper three levels of the Cash mine has been stored underground in several other <br /> mines that are approved water storage areas. For the last four years, we have found that it is <br /> only necessary to pump the Cash mine workings two times a year in order to keep the water <br /> level from rising above the electrical panels located on the first level station of the mine. We <br /> generally pump the mine out during May or June to dewater the mine of the late Winter and <br /> early Spring water inflow; and again in September or October to accommodate the late Fall <br /> and early Winter water inflow. It costs between $600 and $800 for electrical power each time <br /> that the Cash mine pump is turned on during any single period of power usage. If the Cash <br /> mine pump was the source of the water in the creek that Mr. Freirich has observed during <br /> most of the Summer and Fall months, then Gold Hill Ventures would have to be turning on the <br /> pump at least once a month during this same period. This would result in a power bill of <br /> between $3,600 and $4,800 for this interval of time. In fact, the Cash mine can be pumped <br /> below the third level in around eight to ten days, twice a year, for a cost of $1,200 to $1,600. <br /> Common sense would indicate that Gold Hill Ventures would not take six months and $4,800 <br /> to accomplish what it can in two separate months of pumping for a maximum of$1,600. Gold <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.