My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL38263
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL38263
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:05 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:33:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977151
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/30/2007
Doc Name
Requesting determination of damages
From
DRMS
To
R M Hiner Construction Co., Inc.
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF G~ <br />COLORADO <br />,/DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 8[., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 C O L O R A D O <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 DIVISION o r <br />RECLAMATION <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 MINING <br /> - St- <br /> SAFETY <br />October 30, 2007 Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />MC. Rex Hiner Executive Director <br />;/ft. M_ Hiner ConstCUCfion Com an , InC. Ronald W. Cattany <br />P y Division Director <br />11 Austin Road Natural Resource Trustee <br />Lamaz, CO 81052 <br />i~ <br />RE: Letter of September 17, 2007 requesting determination of damages, Greeley Pit, Permit M-1977-151 <br />Deaz Mr. Hiner: <br />Thank you for yow letter of September 17, 2007 requesting that the Division of Reclamation, Mining and <br />Safety (DBMS) conduct an inspection of the Greeley Pit to determine damages from the placement of a City <br />of Greeley sewer pipeline across yow land and permit area. <br />The DBMS cannot do inspections to determine damages to mining resources caused by other entities <br />actions. I would suggest that you obtain the services of a qualified individual to determine those. <br />I do not know exactly what the setback distance from stntctwes was determined at the time that the permit <br />was issued. I do know that permits issued today must maintain setbacks of at feast 200 feet so that the <br />mining operation will not "...adversely affect the stability of any significant, valuable, and permanent <br />manmade structwes located within two hundred feet of the affected land; except that the permit shall not be <br />denied on this basis where there is an agreement between the operator and the persons having an interest in <br />the structwe that damage to the structwe is to be compensated for by the operator or, where such an <br />agreement cannot be reached, the applicant provides an appropriate engineering evaluation that <br />demonstrates that such structwes shall not be damaged by proposed construction materials excavation <br />operations." (see Section 34-32.5-115(4)(e) CRS). <br />Since the permit was issued prior to the building of the sewer line, the DBMS would not have any <br />restrictions regarding mining neaz the pipeline. Damage to the pipeline from mining would be a civil matter <br />between the operator and the owner of the pipeline. <br />You should be aware that, should Hiner Construction ever file an amendment on this permit, the DBMS <br />would then consider the effect of the mining operation on the sewer pipeline. <br />Si ely, --- <br />B. Mount ' <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver Grand Junttion • Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.