Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />December 29, 1981 <br />Page Two <br />Stipulation 9 <br />Coors Energy Company must collect ad di tioi <br />season for vegetative productivity of the <br />communities so as to achieve a confidence <br />sample mean within 10% of the true mean). <br />submitted to the Division before December <br />ral samples in the 1981 growing <br />Valent sand and Osgood sand <br />level of at least 80% (with a <br />This information must be <br />81, 1981. <br />Vegetative productivity of both the Osgood and Valent Sands in the <br />area to be mined was completely resampled on September 28, 1981 to <br />achieve the stated MLRD requirement of an 80% confidence level (with a <br />sample mean within 10% of the true mean). An explanation of the samp- <br />ling procedures and productivity results comparing the area to be mined <br />with the reference areas is contained in the attached three page report <br />from our vegetation consultant, Mr. Don Hyder. <br />Stipulation 10 <br />Coors Energy Company and the Division shall work jointly to establish a <br />woody plant density standard for the Keenesburg mine by December 31, 1981. <br />The sandsage density recommended for the Keenesburg Mine area <br />reclamation revegetation is described by our consultant on pages 78 - 81 <br />in the Permit Application text. He notes that sandsage densities on the <br />Osgood and Valent sands in the area to be mined statistically average <br />1840 plants per acre. Furthermore, he notes that the range condition <br />was heterogeneous and where range condition was good the sandsage density <br />varied from 200 to 900 per acre. Selecting 400 plants per acre as "near <br />ideal" and then applying statistical computations, he arrives at a <br />success standard of 302 sandsage per acre. The major intent of this <br />recommended density is to refrain from setting a success standard that <br />would reproduce poor range conditions for cattle grazing. <br />The Colorado Division of Wildlife has suggested reclamation sandsage <br />densities for wildlife habitat based on three variations of related <br />topographical and botanical conditions existing on the Tamarac in eastern <br />Colorado. This information is contained in a letter from the Division <br />of Wildlife dated June 19, 1981, shown in our Permit Application on <br />pages 137 and 138. <br />Our consultant believes that Condition 2 most closely typifies the <br />terrain and botanical composition found at the Keenesburg Mine site. <br />The topography is best described as "gently rolling" as opposed to <br />"depressions" (Condition 1) and "other side slopes and ridge tops" <br />(Condition 3). Elevations over the 1500 acre total mine site area vary <br />from 4775 ft, to 4900 ft., a range of only 125 feet, and ground slopes <br />are around 1% to 4%. The site is neither a major depression area nor <br />composed of steep slopes and ridges. Reclamation topography will approxi- <br />mate the premining surface; however, the terrain features will be even <br />further "rounded down". <br />