My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL37691
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL37691
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:43 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:16:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981026
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/1/1991
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL2
From
Phase II
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROPOSED DECISION - Canadian StriplPhase II Bond Release <br />August 1, 1991 <br />Page 3 <br />On June 20, 1990, a partial inspection focusing on erosional stability was <br />performed at the Canadian Strip Mine. In attendance were Cathy Begej and <br />Susan McCannon of CMLRD, Mark Humphrey, of the OSM WTC in Denver, Jeff Zingo, <br />of OSM Albuquerque Field Office and Bill Hill, Greystone Development <br />consultants. Greystone is the permitting liaison for Wyoming Fuel Company and <br />they prepared the request for Phase II Bond Release. <br />Mark Humphrey had worked extensively with a classification system on erosion <br />developed by Ronnie Clark and described in USDI-BLM Technical Note X346, <br />Erosion Condition Classification System. This document describes a method for <br />quantifying the degree of erosion at a site and the subsequent organization of <br />the data into erosion classes entitled stable, slight, moderate, critical or <br />severe erosion conditions. In addition, the document suggests that the <br />moderate erosional condition class would be disruptive to cropland and <br />forestry post-mining land use, and that the critical and severe erosional <br />condition would be disruptive of all post-mining land uses, including <br />rangeland and fish and wildlife habitat, the designated post-mining land use <br />at the site. <br />The classification system evaluates erosion condition based on seven <br />categories: soil movement; litter movement; surface rock fragments; <br />pedestalling; flow patterns; rills and gullies. Each category is broken Into <br />five levels of erosion. If a category was present, the maximum score possible <br />was listed in a column entitled "possible factors'. Observations were rated <br />and listed in a column entitled 'identified factors'. <br />At Canadian Strip, all five of the participants present on June 6, 1990, rated <br />the east facing slope upslope from Pond 2 to become familiar with the system <br />following instruction from Mark Humphrey. Later, Mark Humphrey, Cathy Begej <br />and Bill Hill evaluated the drainage bottom leading into Pond 2, while Jeff <br />Zingo and Susan McCannon evaluated the west facing slope above Pond 2, Cathy <br />Begej evaluated the areas reclaimed prior to 1987. The areas are shown in <br />Figure 3 and the results are shown on Table 2. <br />Most evaluations rated the property as having a "slight" erosional <br />condition. Usually, only five of the erosion condition categories were <br />observed. Very few pedestals or gullies were found at the site. An effort <br />was made to distinguish between recent, active erosion and past erosion. For <br />instance, it was assumed that a highly revegeted rill was formed in the first <br />year, before any vegetative growth appeared. This rill would not be counted <br />as an erosional feature. Clumps of grass on hilislopes frequently showed some <br />soil deposition upslope and 1/4" to 1/2" of exposed roots on the downshope <br />side. This feature was evaluated in the soil movement tategory. Raindrop <br />imprints were visible on clumps of dirt or areas without vegetative cover. <br />Wyoming Fuel Company had used large, 2" wood chips as a mulch. These were <br />frequently aligned between drill rows or in the bottom of rills found on <br />slopes. Recent movement of wood chips was assigned to the category of litter <br />movement, along with all other organic matter but scat (antelope pellets). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.