My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-02-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1983052
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1983052
>
1998-02-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1983052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 11:50:56 AM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:15:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983052
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/25/1998
From
BLM
To
KNIGHT PIESOLD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
°°��Nl 0/ 1 • 'II I III III III IIII III � <br /> ° - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 999 <br /> a - <br /> - `o BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT <br /> ' LITTLE SNAKE RESOURCE AREA <br /> 455 EMERSON STREET <br /> CRAIG, COLORADO 81625-1129 <br /> In Reply Refer To: <br /> 3809 (170) <br /> PO-016-83-1 <br /> February 20 , 1998 <br /> RECEIVED <br /> Mr. Richard Weber 'C� ti .Zrr <br /> Knight Piesold ) � l <br /> 249 Third Street <br /> Elko, Nevada 89801 _ _ _ _ . _ _ —_ Division ofKnefals&Geology <br /> Dear Mr. Weber: <br /> In your letter, dated February 10, 1998 , you requested information <br /> that BLM requires in order to approve the use of LOC (Amway Liquid <br /> Organic Cleaner) to ore in Colorado. This letter is to make clear the <br /> position of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding proposed <br /> operations at the Joker Mine, located in Moffat County, Colorado. We <br /> will not consider or approve the application of LOC alone, without <br /> considering the entire project including the additional mining <br /> disturbance, transportation of ore and tailings , and the disposal of <br /> the tailings . <br /> As discussed with Janet Hook, of this office, on the afternoon of <br /> January 9, 1998 , prior to a public meeting in Baggs, Wyoming, the <br /> existing plan of operations needs to be updated to include the new <br /> proposed activities and approved prior to commencement of operations . <br /> You have submitted copies of correspondence between Mining and <br /> Minerals LTD and the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) , <br /> and a letter from Knight Piesold LLC describing the modified SPLP test <br /> results . However, the BLM still has not received a written proposal <br /> to modify the Plan of Operations that was approved for the Marathon <br /> Gold operations and transferred to Orvie Zimmerman in the mid-1980s . <br /> Information that should be .. your plan of operations is described at <br /> 43 CFR 3809 and includes , but is not limited to, the following: <br /> (1) Name and mailing address of operator and claimant, if other <br /> than the operator <br /> (2) A map, preferably a topographic map, or sketch showing <br /> existing and/or proposed routes of access, and size of each <br /> area where surface disturbance will occur; <br /> (3) The name of the mining claim(s) and mining claim serial <br /> numbers assigned to the mining claim(s) recorded. <br /> (4) Information sufficient to describe or identify the type of <br /> operations proposed, how they will be conducted and the <br /> period during which the proposed activity will take place; <br /> (5) Measures to be taken to prevent unnecessary or undue <br /> degradation and measures to reclaim disturbed areas <br /> resulting from the proposed operations, including the <br /> standards listed in §3809. 1-3 (d) of this title . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.