My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL37416
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL37416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:33 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:09:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994113
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/29/2004
Doc Name
Recent Court Filings
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEP-29-2004 11:50 FROM: BILL & JRNE JRNKE 1-970-728-6315 T0: 19702475104 P.4 <br />SiP-02-'04 11:20A6t FkOtt-White and st' 3032963131 T•403 P 038/043 F-102 <br />On September 1, 2004, the Board issued a final permit to Pathfinder. Pathfinder has <br />repeatedly slated that it will immediately begin its intended construc[ion which will necessitate. <br />the use of heavy equipment and consirucrion traffrc over the penstock. [Yerified Coneplainr ~!~ <br />27 and 28.) FERC has not approved any construction plan not; could it in that Pathfinder has <br />refused to provide the same to PSCo. upon information and belief, now that it has [he permits, <br />Pathfinder has begun to move construction traffic across the penstock or will immediately begin <br />stteh process. <br />II. IMMEDIATE INJUNCTIVE RELIET IS NECESSARY <br />hnmediate injunctive relief is necessazy to halt Pathfinder's actions in moving heavy <br />equipment traffic over rite penstock pending approval by FERC. Immediate a„d irreparab]e <br />Karin will result if the construe[ion is not halted. <br />Further, coons have recognized that when evidence which shows that a defendant is <br />engaged in, or about to be engaged in, an act or practice prohibited by a statute, such as violation <br />of the Federal Power Act, 1 G U.S.C. §791(x) et seq, irreparable Kann to the plaintiff need not be <br />shown. Star Fuel'blazts. LLC. V. Sam's Last, Inc., 353 F.3d 639, 65l (] 0"' Cir. 2004). 'I'ltis rule <br />must certainly apply and mandate injunctive relief when a private company moves in direct <br />violation of the order of a governmental agency, such as FERC. <br />Even though proof of irreparable harm is not necessazy, PSCo will show that irrepazable <br />harm will be caused by construction activity in direct proximity to the penstock without <br />assurance that the penstock will nor be damaged. If Pathfinder is not stopped, FERC will require <br />that the penstock be de-watered and the hydroelectric plant shut down. See, Pxhibit 1, <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.