My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL37339
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL37339
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:30 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:06:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980149
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/19/1981
Doc Name
MEMO WELD CNTY HOKESTRA PIT FILE 80-149
From
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO Ric HnRn D~M, fovc~n nr <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL gE50URCE5 <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) fl,~9c3667 <br />866 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />March 19, 1981 <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />Stmmtary of John Slovek's letter to Governor Lamm <br />RE: Weld County <br />Hokestra Pit <br />File: 1180-149 <br />The accusations: <br />1. Weld County operating adjacent to complaintant without State MLR permit. <br />2. During this time, complaintant contends the operator caused damage by <br />his operation to the complaintants property. <br />3. Injured party complained to MLR. <br />a. Protested the granting of a permit to the operator "all summer". <br />b. A permit should not have been granted, according to complaintant, <br />due to J34-32-120, 1973 CRS. <br />4. At the hearing to consider Civil Penalties, (July 25, 1980) MLR, it is <br />claimed, made decisions of prejudice, perjury, injustice, and laxity. <br />complaintant cites tapes as evidence. (NOTE: transcript available) <br />5. complaintant claims his written objections to the Board of granting a <br />permit: <br />a. were never discussed objectively; <br />b. complaintants rights under MLR Act were "completely ignored"; and, <br />c. complaintants appeal for a hearing was not granted by the Board. <br />complaintant desires: <br />1. An impartial investigation by the Judicial Committee of the Colorado <br />State Legislature. <br />2. Claims the County and the Division "have breached the law". <br />3. Desires to have his evidence of his above claimes included in the <br />proposed investigation. <br />BJ/jm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.