My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL37230
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL37230
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:26 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:02:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/21/1993
Doc Name
REPORT LANDSLIDE INVESTIGATION REPORT JUMBO MOUNTAIN SOMERSET COLO FOR ARCO COAL CO PROJECT # 2272-0
Permit Index Doc Type
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
] current movement, also occurs in many places above the lower bench within the limits of the <br />old landslide shown on Figure 1. These observations suggest that the area has had a long and <br />probably continuous history of slope movements. <br />Nature of Lineaments <br />Several lineaments were noted on the aerial photographs and aze shown in Figure 1. These <br />lineaments appear to delineate the upslope extent of past movemenu of the old landslide mass. <br />I There aze also two prominent lineaments which form drainage lines intersecting the central part <br />of the slide mass. There is no evidence that any of these lineaments are the surface expressions <br />of faults in the underlying bedrock. In fact, structure contours on the base of the 'B' seam <br />(Figure 8) are relatively linear and evenly spaced, suggesting that there is no significant faulting <br />of that stratum in this area. It should be noted that a smoothing program was used to plot those <br />structure contours. The initial plot, prior to smoothing, showed anomalous features near the <br />northern margin of the azea, beneath the old landslide deposits of the lower bench. The <br />1 anomalies may be due to errors in elevations recorded for some of the older borings. However, <br />since this azea is well to the north of the proposed longwall mine there would not appeaz to be <br />any point in further investigation. <br />DLSCUSSION <br />The availab]e evidence indicates that the Jumbo Mountain landslide is an ancient feature. The <br />lower bench portion of the landslide mass does not conform to the mound-like shape which <br />' usually characterizes the lower part of a large slide. It is likely that this bench represents only <br />a small remnant of the original mass, the rest having been removed by erosion, over a period <br />' of hundreds or thousands of years. <br />The North Fork Gunnison River valley has a long history of slope instability of which the Jumbo <br />' Mountain landslide represents only one example. Because the Jumbo Mountain landslide had <br />the effect of reducing the overall valley slope in this area, the potential for additional lazge-scale <br />I sliding on Jumbo Mountain is less than for other parts of the valley which have not been <br />similarly affected. <br />I <br />I -11- <br />I ~ 0: \Off\30\JP7URG0-Rpt.lkl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.