Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment <br />Memo/Marion Dodson <br />Pane -2- <br />March 3, 1980 <br />Section 2.1.9. Subsidence <br />The treatment of subsidence presented in this section of the application <br />1s inadequate to scc(isfy the requirements of the federal Pcrenanent Regu- <br />lations. Sections 184.20 and 817.121, 2, 4 P: f each apply to subsidence <br />occurrence over underground coal mines. The regs (sec. 78n.20) require <br />that the applicant submit a subsidence surve The survey is to deter- <br />mine; (i) whether any structures or renewable resource lands exist <br />within the permit and adjacent area; and if so, (2) whether subsidence <br />could cause "material damage" or a reduction of the "reasonably fore- <br />seeable usa" of thos? structures or renewable resource lands. <br />The first task is straightforward. The applicant must inventory the <br />permit and adl.acent area to delineate structures and renewable resource <br />lands. Th^ fedr~ral regs define renewable resource lands as "aquifers . <br />and assns of silvic;.;tural production of food and fiber, and arazinq <br />lands." The Land ~~se portion of this anplication(Sec. 4.1) /ccoorts <br />that, past, r_xistina and future use of the ma,iori*-v of the permit and <br />adja,~ent area consists of wildlife habitat, ran 0el.end and limited <br />agriculture. By d?finition, therefore, portions of thr_ area will <br />comprise renewable resource lands. The results o` the inventory can <br />probably hest he presented in man form. <br />Thy second task is more complicated. Thy applicant must first project <br />t•ihat subsidence is expected to occur within the permit and adjacent <br />area. This technical analvsis must be pr?~~r?d by an aopropr~ately <br />qualif~d prnfessional. This portion of the an°vey must rr.flect the <br />state-nf-th?aart n` current subsidence prediction technolor,y. This <br />analysis should consid?r both small sr_ale rock mechu~ts« of the <br />affected rock materials (shear strength and comnressiv? str?ngth <br />pararpeters) and large scale rock properties such as faulting and <br />frac ring. Laboratory and core drilling data is important, but should <br />be supplemented whenever possible with past observation of previous or <br />current local mine workings. Subsidence prediction is not a definitive <br />science. It is important for the applicant to confirm subsidence <br />protections thheugh operational monitoring. Simplistic systems consist- <br />ing of rows of drilled caisson-type concrete and rebar monuments cep tie <br />installed and monitored above mine workings witho~it orbhibitive cost. <br />Monthly monitoring of these monuments in initial mine workings can be <br />utilized to fine-tune and ame~ld the design of later mine workings. <br />Following the projection of subsidence, the appiicant must determine <br />whether "material damage" or "diminution of reasonably foreseeable <br />use" could result. The applicant should apply the following definitions <br />in completing task tYO: 4aterial subsidence damage means, with respect <br />to structures, any e~a.n9e~ which would make it technologically or <br />e~cyonomically infeasible to promptly restore an affected structure to <br />ZhL condition it would be in if subsidence had not occurred. Material, <br />subsidence damage means, with respect to renewable resource lands, any <br />changes which disrupt an aquifer, or the recharge area of an aquifer' <br />