My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL37118
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL37118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:22 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:00:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999058
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/10/2002
Doc Name
Revegetation Test Plot
From
DMG
To
Sierra Minerals Corporation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SL, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />June ] 0, 2002 <br />Rex E. Loesby~ <br />Sierra Minerals Corp. <br />61645. Newport St. <br />C 1 CO 80111 <br />a~~~~~ <br />'T <br />~`'~p0! <br />~jp~ _z~ <br />men <br />entennla , ~ / r0~ <br />v off. <br />Re: Yule Quarry, Permit M-1999-058, Revegetation Test Plot. <br />Dear Mr. Loesby, <br />DIVISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Director <br />Michael B. LOng <br />Division Director <br />I have received your letter dated June 3, 2002, regarding the test plot at the quarry site. This is a <br />matter we had discussed informally a couple times recently, as a way to possibly reduce or <br />eliminate the need for imported topsoil for reclamation on some of the affected areas of the <br />permit. If the marble fines presently comprising the surface materials can be shown to adequately <br />allow for germination and establishment of the species in your reclamation plan, concurrent <br />reclamation becomes a possibility. Likewise, without the present requirement for topsoil, i.e., <br />recognizing that topsoil needs may be reduced or eliminated, the bond amount may be reduced <br />accordingly. <br />The test plot has been described as fairly small, and will be easy to monitor and report annually. <br />Its establishment should be simple and the space it occupies is minor which, by itself requires <br />nothing to be formally modified on your permit at this time. The test plot is, however, an attempt <br />to gather meaningful information which may lead to changes in the future for the permit, <br />especially the approved reclamation plan. The initial studies that were performed on this <br />alternative growth medium made for a good starting point for this test plot. <br />The course to follow at this time, from my perspective, is <br />document the "inputs" to the plot this first year, such as seedbed preparation, method of seeding, <br />and species and rates of seeding, and rate of fertilizer application; <br />monitor the establishment of the stand of vegetation, such as which species emerged during the <br />first season, which ones did well and poorly, which ones matured (grew a seed head), and <br />possibly quantitive data such as density or percent cover; and <br />track the establishment and evolution of the plot over a few years, reporting the information in the <br />annual reports (by brief narrative and photos). <br />After a few years, if the information gathered from the plot appears to support the idea that <br />topsoil requirements may be reduced or eliminated; a technical revision may be submitted. That <br />will allow time for any informal modifications to be made, which may then be formally <br />introduced to the approved reclamation plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.