Laserfiche WebLink
In 1999, a slump caused by harsh spring rain and snowstorms dislocated approximately 350 of the <br />Douglas Fir seedlings in the south end reclaimed area. The azea will be reworked in 2000 to <br />stabilize the slope and replant seedlings where necessary. <br />Rock staining <br />Early in the project there were high expectations that staining the exposed limestone would <br />contribute significantly to a reduction in contrast between the light-colored limestone and the <br />darker rock in the surrounding area. Rock staining along portions of Colorado's scenic highways <br />has had very positive results, notably Vail Pass and Glenwood Canyoq and some mines have <br />used rock staff"~ with favorable results. However, because the Pikeview benches are covered <br />with unstable rock, it is predicted that stained rock would eventually slough and expose the light- <br />colored, unweathered layer. For this reasoq rock staining was suspended until the stability <br />problems wuld be addressed. The layback plan addresses the stability problem. <br />The Layback Plan <br />Since the initial enhanced reclamation plan was developed, Castle Concrete and the community <br />have continued to consider alternatives to achieve the best possible reclamation for Pikeview. <br />The better-than-expected results at Queens Canyon Quarry and concerns over the stability and <br />unsightly appearance of the benched rock have led to the development of a plan to create a <br />gentler slope on the mined north face and remove the crumbly limestone veneer. This would <br />leave a foundation of stable granite. The granite base would be bacldilled with quarry waste, <br />wvered with topsoil and revegetated. Remaining granite outcroppings would be stained to <br />enhance the natural look of the slope. Tltis plan would include filling the pit to achieve the overall <br />dewed final slope. The layback plan would take several years to achieve because the area would <br />be re-mined, but the end result would be a more stable slope and a greatly improved visual <br />appearance. <br />One reason the layback plan was not part of the original plan and not addressed by MRAC is <br />because the layback will affect the land managed by the U.S. Forest Service to the west of the <br />quarry. Historically, Castle Concrete has not had access to this land, which has limited its mining <br />and its ability to resolve some of the stability and visual impact problems. Within the past few <br />yeazs the layback concept has been discussed with U.S. Forest Service representatives and <br />presentations have been made to the Colorado Springs City Council and the EI Paso County <br />Commissioners, with favorable response from all to date. The concept is currently being <br />presented to groups within the community. <br />RECLAMATION OF SNYDER QUARRY <br />History and Description of Snyder Quarry <br />The Snyder Quany, first mined in 1871, is located south of Queens Canyon and north of Manitou <br />Springs. It had been mined periodically during the 1900s. Castle Concrete acquired the property <br />in December 1969 and commenced mining in 1970. Initially most of the mining was conducted <br />by underground methods, so the surface disturbance was not extensive. By 1980, when Castle <br />Concrete obtained a Mined Land Reclamation Permit, all but a small amount of the mining was <br />(15) <br />