My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL37055
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL37055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:58:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/18/1994
Doc Name
RECLAMATION OF LINDEN AVENUE RAILROAD LOADOUT TRINIDAD BASIN MINING CO REVOKED PN C-81-048
From
DMG
To
TERRY S HAUGEN
Permit Index Doc Type
RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />`~ STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Narural Resources <br />131 7 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />October 18, 1994 <br />Mr. Terry S. Haugen <br />Public Works Director <br />City of Trinidad <br />P. O. Box 880 <br />Trinidad, CO 81082 <br />Re: Reclamation of Linden Avenue Railroad Loadout, Trinidad <br />Basin Mining Company, Revoked Permit No. C-81-048 <br />Dear Mr. Haugen: <br />~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OI <br />NATURAI <br />RESOURCE' <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />Executive Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Di~eao~ <br />Thank you for your letter of September 15, 1994. We appreciate <br />your response, and would like to take this opportunity to discuss <br />a few final items. <br />With regard to your request for testing of the creosote content <br />and acid generation potential of the coal at the Loadout, we <br />agree to add these items to the list of constituents to be <br />analyzed. <br />We would, however, like to request the City consider reviewing <br />the results of a single five-location composite sample only, for <br />the purpose of verifying the presence of hazardous waste, rather <br />than the results from both a single five-location composite <br />sample and the results from five additional single-site samples. <br />The reason we ask this is that the analysis cost per sample, <br />including the creosote and acid generation potential tests, is <br />estimated by our contact at the analysis lab to be about $750 per <br />sample. To conduct the six-sample (one composite sample & five <br />single-site samples) testing scenario requested by the City would <br />result in a total analysis cost of approximately $4,500. By <br />testing only the composite sample, we hope to reduce our analysis <br />costs to $750, and spend the remaining money for the actual <br />removal of the coal to the City's landfill, and the regrading and <br />reseeding of the railroad area. <br />With regard to the request for promixate and free swelling index <br />analyses, we could pay for these additional tests if the City <br />would agree to reviewing the results from a single composite <br />sample. It is my understanding from the analysis lab that the <br />additional cost for both the proximate and swelling index tests <br />would be approximately $150.00 per sample. Again, testing a <br />single sample would reduce our analysis costs and let more funds <br />be used for the actual reclamation of the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.