Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br />i <br />p. 2-4 Solid removzil from the evaporation ponds could risk puncture of the <br />20 mil I{ypalon liner. What method will be used to remove solids to <br />assure protection of the liner's integrity? <br />p. 2-8 The use of former production wells as monitoring wells appears <br />practical and could be effective. The EIS should further describe <br />'how this will be done. EPA suggests that consideration be given to <br />using these wells to monitor the lower aquifer and possibly within <br />the solution cavities themselves. There needs to be further <br />indication of the method proposed for monitoring the integrity of <br />the mud between the 12 1/4 inch borehole and the 8 5/8 inch casing. <br />The document: indicates that the applicant would report water quality <br />monitoring on a yearly basis to EPA. EPA regulations for injection <br />for the purpose of mineral extraction (class III wells) require <br />reporting on a quarterly basis [40 CFR 146.33 (c )]. <br />p. 2-8 The applicant proposes to assure mechanical integrity of the <br />injection wells by pressuring up the annular space between the 8-5/8 <br />inch casing and the 5-1/2 inch production pipe, using air. The <br />pressure will be maintained at 800 psi gauge. If the pressure drops <br />below 700 ps.i, the well will be taken out of service. The proposed <br />plan may not: be adequate to assure that brine will not move into the <br />annular space. Assuming that the brine has a density of 1.2, the <br />production well will have a pressure of about 1000 psi at the base <br />of the 1900 foot casing. This would allow brine to extend into the <br />annular space about 375 feet. This point is above the B-Groove. If <br />the air pressure at the surface dropped to 700 psi, the brine column <br />would extend up the annular space to a point above the A-Groove. <br />p. 2-8 The section on the applicant's monitoring for mechanical intergrity <br />of the wells does not address potential fluid movement through <br />channels adjacent to the well bore. Such a determination must be <br />made, according to UIC regulations, prior to commencement of <br />injection. Two methods, which are approved of by EPA under the UIC <br />program, are noise logs and temperature logs [40 CFR 146.9(3)(c)]. <br />p. 2-8 Additional details are needed on the multiple point borehole <br />extensometer design and installation. Why are surface monuments <br />installed to check for subsidence but not within first 1300 feet of <br />the surface? The subsidence monitoring program may not accomplish <br />its objective of determining the extent of rock fracturing (and <br />hence aquifer interconnection) between the solution cavities and the <br />surface unless additional monuments are established. <br />p. 2-9 How will the applicant assure and monitor the rib pillar dimension <br />of 20 feet? Strength tests have been run on the nahcolite material <br />and should be summarized here. <br />