My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36864
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36864
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:54:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/30/2007
Doc Name
G-Pit Landslide Stability Report Task 2
From
Trapper Mining/Agapito Associates Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Jim Mattern <br />March 19, 2007 <br />Page 6 <br />G-Pit Model Geometry <br />The simulated region covers an area 4,900 ft west to east by 6,200 ft south to north. <br />Model coordinates are consistent with the Colorado State Plane Coordinates referenced to <br />(1,430,000E, 400,000N) in feet. The boundaries of the model extend from 4,900 to 9,800 ft in <br />the east-west direction (X-coordinates) and 0 to 6,200 ft in the north-south direction <br />(Y-coordinates) as shown in Figure 3. The model depth goes from the irregular ground surface <br />down to an elevation of 6,750 ft mean sea level (MSL). <br />The dip of the beds in the eastern portion of G-Pit is known to be about 8° towazds due <br />north. The dip of the beds increases to 10°-12° in the south and southwest portion of the G-Pit <br />and are oriented more northeasterly toward the N25°E direction. The topography and geology <br />was interpolated from six north-south sections located at 4,900, 5,700, 6,830, 7,170, 8,700, and <br />9,800 ft west to east, respectively. These sections aze indicated in Figure 1 by the magenta lines. <br />A linear interpolation algorithm was used for grid point interpolation between sections. The <br />resulting mesh consisted of 408,079 8-noded, 5-tetrahedral zones defined in the model (28% <br />more were deleted because they were above the interpolated topography). <br />G-Pit Model Material <br />Core logging identified over 46 distinct geologic strata, of which some have similar rock <br />types, conditions, and properties and were combined. A total of 23 material layers were <br />simulated in the model. The ubiquitous-joint constitutive models are applied to each rock layer. <br />The ubiquitous-joint model is an anisotropic elasto-plasticity model that includes weak planes of <br />specific orientation embedded in aMohr-Coulomb solid. The mechanical deformation and <br />strength properties for both the in situ rock mass and bedding planes are provided in Table 1 for <br />each rock type. In situ rock mass properties are based on averages from laboratory tests5 <br />adjusted using the widely-accepted Hoek-Brown empirical methodb involving Geologic Strength <br />Index (GSI) and Rock Mass Rating (RMR) from core logs. The assumed orientations of bedding <br />planes are listed in Table 2. Spoils are assumed a medium compacted soil material with low <br />modulus and low strength whose properties are given in Table I. The lithology is based <br />primarily on Borehole OS-Gl-CCR (Figure 4a) and the six geologic sections of major coal <br />seams. The layers as implemented in the model are shown in Figure 4b. <br />G-Pit Model Boundary Conditions <br />Model boundaries respond as if there is material beyond the limits of the model. The <br />four vertical sides (i.e., east, west, north, and south sides) aze roller boundaries with azero- <br />displacement condition, which means the geometry outside the model mirrors the geometry <br />inside. This is accurate because mining is generally not near the boundaries and their location <br />has been selected as a line of geometric symmetry. The ground surface was unrestrained and the <br />s Agapito Associate, Inc. (2006), "Trapper Mining Inc.-Rock Mechanics Core Testing Results," prepazed for <br />Trapper Mining, Inc., February 6. <br />e Hoek E. and E. T. Brown (2000), "Empirical Strength Criterion for Rock Masses," Journal of Geotechnical <br />Engineering Div., ASCE 106(GT9), 1,011,035. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.