My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-05-11_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2000002
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2000002
>
2000-05-11_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2000002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 12:50:58 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:53:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/11/2000
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO MAY 2 2000 COMMENT SUPPLIED BY COUNSEL FOR PINNACLE PINES LLC
From
MASSEY SEMENOFF STERN & SCHWARZ PC
To
TUTTLE APPLEGATE INC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MASSEY SEMENOFF STERN 8a SCHWARZ~ P.C. <br />Ms. Pam Acre <br />Mr. Bill Schenderlein <br />May 10, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br />conform with Boulder County Zoning Resolution requirements for issuance of a Special Use <br />Permit for open mining in a Forestry Zoning District.[ <br />In 1988, House Bill 162 amended the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Ac[, including <br />the provisions cited so prominently in Pinnacle's May 2 comment. Chap. 249, §§ 1 to 18, Colo. <br />Sess. Laws 1200-1215, 1988. More specifically, both Sections 34-32.5-109(6) and 34-32.5- <br />115(4) were amended so as remove those provisions of the statute that affirmatively precluded <br />the Boazd from granting a mined land reclamation permit that violated local land use authorities. <br />This approach was also codified by the General Assembly in Senate Bill 95-156, which <br />became law in 1995 and established the "Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of <br />Construction Materials" (34-32.5-101, C.R.S. e_t se .; see also Sections 34-32.5-109(3) and 34- <br />32.5-115(4), C.R.S.). The construction materials statute and regulations make it the operator's <br />responsibility to obtain all necessary local land use approvals, a process in which, I understand, <br />Mobile Premix is currently engaged. Should the timing of this eventual approval lag behind the <br />Board's action for some reason, the Board certainly could condition the commencement of <br />operations on the Tanabe property upon the issuance of the underlying local land use approval. <br />Pinnacle's May 2, 2000 comment clearly misrepresents the state of the law. Not only <br />does the comment cite an old case decided on law that had been amended even before the case <br />was decided, but it neglects the fact that sand and gravel mining operations are actually subject <br />to a different statute and implementing regulations than those Pinnacle cites. These facts will not <br />be lost on the Board should it choose to consider the comment. <br />Please call me if [can be of further assistance. <br />Very truly yours, <br />MASSEY SEMENOF'F STERN & SCHWARZ, P.C. <br />~wZ <br />Jeffrey W. Schwarz <br />To that end, the case is most often cited for the proposition that neither the zoning authority of local <br />govemment, nor the Board's mined land reclamation authorities, conFlict with the State Land Board's authority to <br />administer public lands granted by the federal govemment to the State of Colorado for [he benefit of Colorado <br />public schools. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.