Laserfiche WebLink
enviromnent, the Boazd shall exempt such operation, whether conducted pursuant to <br />section 34-32-110 or otherwise. [Emphasis added.] <br />Cotter has demonstrated that the SM-18 Mine may properly be deemed exempt because <br />"acid- or toxic-producing materials will be insufficient to adversely affect persons, property or <br />the environment." The Boazd should approve the fmal determination of the Division that the <br />SM-18 Mine should not be classified as a designated mining operation. <br />Respectfully submitted this 29"' day of August, 2007. <br />RYLEY OARLOCK & APPLEWHITE <br />hn L. Watson <br />Attorneys for Cotter Corporation <br />Certificate of Service <br />I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing COTTER <br />CORPORATION'S RESPONSE TO THE BRIEF OF APPELLANT RE: THE <br />DIVISION'S DETERMINATION THAT THE SM-18 MINE IS NOT A DESIGNATED <br />MIINING OPERATION was served via electronic transmission and the U.S. Mail, properly <br />addressed as follows: <br />Jeffrey C. Pazsons <br />Senior Attorney <br />Western Mining Action Project <br />P.O. Box 349 <br />Lyons, CO 80540 <br />303-823-5738 <br />Fax 303-823-5732 <br />wmap~r ,i Qc.or¢ <br />10 <br />