Laserfiche WebLink
<br />% a . ,/~'~ M ti/t'1~ <br />~i Gl~~c~3~-j <br />BEFORE THE MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />IN THE MATTER OF COTTER CORPORATION'S APPEAL OF FINAL DNISION <br />DETERMINATION OF DESIGNATED MINING OPERATION STATUS FOR THE JD-6, JD- <br />8, AND JD-9 URANIiIN1 MINES, FILE NUMBERS M-1977-310, M-1984-014, and M-1977- <br />306 <br />and <br />IN THE MATTER <br />STATUS FOR THE SM-1 <br />ING DESIGNATED MIN~DIf: <br />NUMBER M-1978-116 <br /> <br />COTTER CORPORATION'S RESPONSE TO THE BRIEF OF APPELLANTS <br />RE: THE DIVISION'S DETERMINATION THAT THE SM-]8 MINE <br />IS NOT A DESIGNATED MIINING OPERATION <br />Cotter Corporation ("Cotter"), by and through its attorneys, Ryley Carlock & <br />Applewhite, submits the following Response to the Brief of Appellant related to the final <br />determination by the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety ("Division") that the SM-18 <br />Mine is not a designated mining operation pursuant the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act <br />("MLRA" or "Act"). <br />SUMMARY <br />Cotter asks that the Mined Land Reclamation Boazd ("Boazd") adopt the final <br />detemunation of the Division that the SM-18 Mine is not properly classified or to be regulated <br />as a designated mining operation ("DMO"). <br />won 1 0 ~oo~ <br />Dm. aon, <br />P.rinuiy ~~~.....:~e'<A <br />