My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36583
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36583
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:04 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:47:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1983058
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/10/1990
Doc Name
TWIN PINES STIPULATION STATUS C-83-058
From
MLRD
To
TWIN PINES INVESTMENT LTD
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />pF COCO <br />Department of Natural Resources tip- a, <br />~e f ,rR,. <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 ~(T`~ `~7 ~$ <br />Denver, CO 80203 ',~~.v',~ <br />303 866-3567 'ra~a• <br />FA%:303 632-8106 <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />Fretl R Banla. <br />Division Dvector <br />May 10, 1990 <br />Mr. Chris Reed <br />Twin Pines Investment Ltd. <br />P.O. Box 187 <br />Rockvale, Colorado 81244-0187 <br />RE: Twin Pines Stipulation Status (C-83-058) <br />Dear Chris; <br />This letter is to clarify the status of the stipulations on the recently <br />renewed Twin Pines mine permit. As I explained to Larry White, the three <br />new stipulations are in the permit document because they had not yet been <br />addressed at the time the documents were prepared. However, they were <br />addressed at the end of the renewal process and have been satisfied. <br />A copy of the application for modification of the mine's NPDES permit <br />(dated March 28, 1990) was received, satisfying stipulation No. 10. <br />Materials and data submitted to amend Sec. 2,05 addressed the issue of mine <br />water passing through the bench sediment pond. The Division determined based <br />on this data, that the pond is adequately sized so, stipulation No. 11 is <br />satisfied. <br />Stipulation No. 12 was satisfied by revision of p. 75 to indicate that runoff <br />from topsoil stockpiles was contained by berms and vegetative cover. <br />Stipulation No. 3 remains from the original Findings document and will be <br />relevant should the operation decide to make beneficial use of the mine water <br />discharge. <br />If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />Larry P. Routten <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />LPR/yjb <br />7024E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.