|
r 11 f ' ; f l~- ii--4~+~
<br />COLORADO
<br />Di5TR1CT COUR"C- 5AN JU/~N COtIN'TX, • ~ i ~ k"
<br />i;~
<br />; , ;
<br />~
<br />-
<br />
<br />Court Addres,- 1557 Greene Street, Silvertori CO ~1~3' it ~~ ,
<br />•,;,
<br />F ,
<br />r.~,+ ~ •. t~.,'t`>, :
<br />''~-
<br />TelephoneNo.: (970)387-5790 `~'-~+: ~,+.,;~~
<br />Plaintiff(s): San Juan Corp., a Colorado Cor~toi+atio~F;;~"'=~;
<br />
<br />• r~r ,1
<br />`V
<br />v. ~ COURT U5EONL ~
<br />Defendant(s): Gold lting Mines Corporation, a Colorado ,.
<br />CllrpOratiOn rti ~ '~yY
<br />Attorney or Party Withnut Attorn¢y: Case No.: U4CV 8
<br />McDANifiL, B.~7.'Y, MILLER, AGRO, WALF,S &
<br />ROBBINS. L.L.C.
<br />Nancy Agro
<br />] 040 Main Avenue
<br />Durango. C0 81301
<br />Telephone No.: (97p) 247.1113
<br />Nacsimile No.: (970) 259-9479 Div.: Ctrm.:
<br />!': Mail: a ro~a~,mcdaniel-law,cotn
<br />Attorney Registration No.: 249].0
<br />ORDER
<br />~Ci [CS MA7'fER, came before the Court upon for a heating on the Plaintiff s olaim for
<br />possession. The Court FIND5 xs follows:
<br />1. San ,loan Corp ac Landlord and Gold King Mines Corporation as tenant entered a lease on
<br />January Z3, ZOD4. The property leased is described as the northern 4.23 acres of the Herbert
<br />Placer, USMS No. 1352, more specifically described as: Beginning at Corner No. 1 of said
<br />Herbert Placer, whence U5LM Florence bears S79° 50' W., 53D.4 ft.; T7tence, N74° 15' Z;., 740
<br />ft. to corner No. 2; Thence, S 11 ° 17E, 293 fl along line 2-3 of said Herbert Placer; Tbenee, N81 °
<br />1D'G, 516 ft; I"hence, 582° 52'W, 149 ft; Thence, N86° 56'W, 49.5 $, to a point on line 5-1 of
<br />said i [erbert Placer; Thence N3' S9'W, 180 ft, to the point of beginning, situate in San .loan
<br />County, Colorado, hereinafter the Premises,
<br />2. Gold King Mines Corporation breached the terms of that lease In at Icast one significant way.
<br />3. Regarding the obligation of the tenant to provide electricity to the Quonset but in accordance
<br />with Paragraph 2(a) of the lease, the tenant failed to provide electricity during the lease tettn on
<br />at least two occasions. the second occasion occtitred in September of 2004, oiler a Notice of
<br />Default had been served and cared, There is no tight to cure the second violation in accordance
<br />with Paragraph 2(t) of the lease and C.R.S. 13-40-104(e.5). The Court find that this is a material
<br />OOB-d 500/Z00'd 9EE-1 A99E99EEOE E398fI0S3tl 1tltlI11tlN 100-WOad WdOZ~tO YOOZ-OZ-OI
<br />
|