My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36281
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36281
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:54 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:41:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/18/1998
Doc Name
RESPONSED TO BLM ISSUES WITH THE COMMERCIAL MINE PLAN
From
AMERICAN SODA
To
BLM WITH COPY PROVIDED TO DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The genera! approach to vegetative clearing in both corridors will be to remove only <br />that vegetation necessary for access and construction. For pzrposes of analysis in the <br />EIS, it is reasonable to assume that all vegetation would be removed from the <br />corridors. In actuality, [ow-lying vegetation (e.g., grasses) will probably remain over <br />much of both corridors and woody vegetation wozrld remain wizerever passible <br />within the construction corridor. Soil disturbance would occur only where local <br />topography requires minor adjustments to allow uniforzn piping and where support <br />pilings are placed. No substantive cut and fill is envisioned for the well field piping, <br />but same will occur, as necessary. For purposes of analysis in the EIS, it is reasonable <br />to assume that some soil distzrbance could occur over 80 percent of the piping <br />corridor and 30 percent of the construction corridor. The following summarizes the <br />estimates of disturbance associated with the well field piping in the for the 0-5 year <br />mine panel. <br />Area Piping <br />Corridor Construction <br />Corridor Total Disturbance <br />Area <br />Main Header System 1.95 acres 1.95 acres 3.90 acres <br />Lateral System 1.47 acres 1.47 acres 2.94 acres <br />Individual We[1 Piping 0.72 acres 0.72 acres 1.44 acres <br />TOTAL 4.14 acres 4.14 acres 8.28 acres <br />Within the total of 8.28 acres of disturbance, vegetation would be removed from the <br />entire area and soils would be disturbed on about 4.55 acres. <br />23. Section 2.1.5, page 2-10 -The pond will be constructed with a single liner. How will <br />American Soda monitor for leakage? What will they do if there is a leak? What is the expected <br />water quality? How high will the berms be? This would affect the impact assessment for soils, <br />vegetation, groundwater, etc. should there be a leak or overtopping. <br />Several changes to the ponds have been made (also see item 2). The evaporation <br />pond at the Piceance Site and both the evaporation pond and the MVR purge pond <br />at the Parachute Site will be constnzcted with a double liner and leak detection <br />system in accordance with the requirements of the Colorado Division of Minerals <br />Geology (CDMG). The liner system will consist of two geornernbrane liners and a <br />leak detection and collection systezn. The top liner will be 60-mil HDPE and the <br />bottom liner will be 40-mil HDPE. Between the tzuo liners, a geonet mnterial will be <br />installed. Geonets are geosynthetic materials that are designed to easily convey <br />flzrids. The geonet will collect and transport any water that may leak through the <br />upper liner. <br />The geonet layer will drain to a szrmp system. The sump will be egzzipped with a <br />szr6znersible pzrmp, zvlziclz will be azrtomatically activated by a fluid-level sensor <br />switch in the suznp. T)ze szzznp pzzznp will disc{zarge any leakage back into the pond. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.