My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36138
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36138
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:49 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:37:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
Federal Lease COC-54558 Decision Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the income and employment effects of the mine would be for a <br />longer period.' At the estimated production level of 4.0 million <br />tone per year of federal coal, 190 employees would be needed to <br />• mine the coal. The mine presently employs 180 to 185 people. <br />B. Alternative Two - No Action <br />Environmental Consequences <br />There are no known additional impacts to the following resources: <br />climate, air quality, recreation, soils, mineral resources, water <br />resources, vegetation, wildlife, land use, cultural or visual <br />resources. If the lease is not granted, there is a high <br />likelihood that the coal would never be mined. In that case, <br />this alternative would result in a loss of production to_ the <br />nation of 10 million tons of coal. <br />If the coal in the proposed lease area is Wined at another date, <br />it would be done at a higher cost due to the need for reentry. <br />While the economic benefits of Alternative One might still be <br />enjoyed, they would be achieved at a higher cost and hence, less <br />efficiently. Or the bypassed coal may never be mined due to <br />technical difficulties and economic constraints. <br />There are no Mitigation Measures or Residual Impacts resulting <br />from Alternative Two. <br />V. MITIGATION MEASURES <br />• With respect to bald or golden eagle nests which may be <br />established on the review area during the life of the project, <br />the following shall be applied. No new permanent surface <br />facilities or disturbances shall be located within a 1/4 mile <br />radius buffer zone around each bald or golden eagle nest site. <br />No surface activities would be alloyed within a i/4 mile radius <br />buffer zone around each eagle nest site from March 1 to July 1. <br />Any proposed activities in, or adjacent to, these buffer zones <br />(except routine maintenance) will require approval from the BLM, <br />on a site-specific basis, after consultation with the USFWS. <br />Because the presence of Grand Mesa Penstemon has been documented <br />in elevations above 7300 feet, a Threatened and Endangered plant <br />survey will be required prior to any surface disturbance. <br />To protect and preserve breeding and nesting habitat for the <br />Loggerhead shrike, disturbances in sagebrush and oak stands <br />should be avoided to the extent possible. <br />Where possible avoid surface disturbance to areas overlain by the <br />Fughes loam soil series. <br />As part of the Mine and Reclamation Permit Application Package, <br />the lessee shall furnish to the Regulatory Officer at the Office <br />• of Surface Mining, an estimate of the average annual water <br />depletion resulting from the proposed action. This will require <br />the project proponent's one-time contribution to the Recovery <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.