My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36056
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:46 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:35:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/8/1986
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Gelches, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />April 8, 1986 <br />Mr. Martin Holmes <br />Kaiser Coal Corporation <br />102 South Tejon Street, Suite 800 <br />P. 0. Box 2679 <br />~~I I~~I~~~I~II~~ ~~~ <br />sss <br />Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901-2679 <br />Re: Mid-Term Review of Somerset Mine - File No. C-81-022 <br />Dear Mr. Holmes: <br />Attached is the Division's Mid-Term Review and Decision to require revisions <br />to the Somerset Mine, Permit No. C-81-022. The review was in fulfillment of <br />Rules 2.08.3, 2.06.2(9), 2.06.3(4), 2.06.5(3), 2.06.7(5), and 3.02.2(4). <br />The mid-term review primarily consisted of reviewing the permit application <br />stipulation responses, revisions, and any supplemental information, as well as <br />information from field inspections and past inspection reports. The main <br />purpose of the review was to identify any areas of the permit application that <br />will need to be revised or modified to ensure compliance and reflect the <br />current status of the mine. <br />The attached document contains our mid-term review, a rationale for requiring <br />any revisions to the application, timetables for submitting responses, a <br />summary of the status of stipulations, and the results of our performance bond <br />review. <br />Questions arose under the categories of Format and Supplemental Information, <br />Soils and Revegetation, Surface and Groundwater Hydrology, and Bonding. The <br />Division requires your response to these items by June 1, 1986. <br />The Division requests that Kaiser Coal Corporation submit appropriate <br />responses to our concerns raised in this letter as a separate technical <br />revision in accordance with Rule 2.08.4(5)(b) to include public participation <br />in our review process. This will require Kaiser Coal Corporation to publish <br />Notice of the Technical Revision once in a local newspaper and have a copy of <br />the technical revision application filed by the recorder at the nearest county <br />courthouse. Within 60 days after the filing of the complete application for a <br />technical revision, the Division will issue a proposed decision approving or <br />denying the application in whole or in part. The Division will send Kaiser a <br />written copy of the proposed decision and Kaiser will publish the decision <br />once in a local newspaper. The public then has 10 days to request a board <br />hearing after such publication; otherwise the decision is final. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.