My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36031
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:45 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:34:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/17/1995
Doc Name
HEARING PROTEST ON CWL CLAIM PO C-79064
From
CAPITOL COMPLEX FACILITIES
To
COLO WEST LEASING
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• <br />#3 <br />CJ <br />The State failed to stake the outer limits of grading areas. <br />This has caused great expense to the CWL. <br />Task #2 says that the State will stake the outer limits of <br />grading where deemed necessary. A letter dated May 16, 1995, <br />indicated that Bill Colgate had been asked numerous times during <br />the first month to have the Chen's Hill area staked. This letter <br />was written after an issue had come up over the disturbance of 2 <br />(or 2.5) acres of adjacent land outside of the work area. Based <br />on the information that I was able to obtain, I could neither <br />substantiate the claim or deny the claim. <br />Task #5 states that the owner will stake the outer edges for the <br />convenience of all parties. It was my understanding that the ~ <br />fence on the east side had been established as the outer edge. SLo ~E <br />Task #11 states that approximately 100 feet back from the east <br />edge of the East Pit, as staked by the State, to reduce the <br />highwall. I am of the understanding that the area east and south <br />of the East Pit was flagged. <br />Overall there appears to have been some staking or indications of <br />landmarks for the purpose of establishing boundaries and that the <br />issue of staking became an issue after the fact. The one <br />questionable area involves Task #2. <br />Upon the completion of my review, I read a previous response from <br />Sandra Brown, which indicates that staking at Chen's Hill may <br />have been an issue. Since we both found this issue to be <br />questionable, I believe her judgement was fair and sound. <br />#4 <br />The State was required to furnish seed within 5 working days <br />notice.__CWL notified John Nelson on May 20th that they would <br />need seed in 5 days. <br />The claim contends that the seed should have been delivered <br />within 5 days of notification or May 25, yet Task #14 calls for a <br />two week notice. This would have placed the due date at June 3, <br />1994. Mr. Meese contends that Mr. Nelson delivered that seed on <br />June 12th. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.