GENERAL35973 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The drainage control system was found in good condition during the inspection. Water monitoring continues under the approved plan. No surface or sub-surface water pollution due to mining at this site has been identified through past or present monitoring. Surface water runoff has been minimal, as both Pond 003 and Pond 004 have remained dry for the majority of time since reclamation began. Ponds were observed as dry during the inspection. Mine flooding is anticipated, but has yet to reach a level that can be measured by one of three water monitoring points, GEM-l, GEM-2, and GEM-3. GEM-1 is the Intake Shaft location labeled South Intake on Map 18 and GEM-2 is [he site labeled 3N Intake. Both of these sites continue to be part of the approved hydrologic monitoring plan and BRI is required to retain access to these locations via any agreements with Stroud Oil, the gas estate operator. GEM-3 is located at the Bleeder Return, which is not part of this industrial land use bond release request. Industrial sites are in compliance with Rule 4.15.10(2), as erosion is not occurring at these sites. Due to their relatively small size and the fact that the sites are interspersed among the native vegetative community, these sites do not require the use of greenbelts for use as food and cover for wildlife. Therefore, the Division finds the industrial sites are also in compliance with Rule 4.18(5)(k). Areas Over(vine Underground Workinp,~ Two longwall panels, SW 1 and SW2, were mined south of Highway 12 at the Golden Eagle mine, from July of 1989 to January of 1991. The panel layout is clearly depicted on Map 17, Subsidence Monuments, of the approved permit application. The subject lands therefore meet the criteria of a minimum liability period of three years after mining, in accordance with Division policy. During the bond release inspection, two ground cracks of limited extent were observed south of the SW2 longwall panel. The width of these cracks rarely exceeded 6 inches and had partially filled in with sediment, soil, and sloughage since mining some 7-8 years ago. Two other areas, one east of the longwall mined area, and one northwest of the longwall mined area, were traversed on foot during the inspection. No evidence of subsidence could be positively identified. Subsidence cracks of this nature do not appear to have any appreciable affect on the environment. One area south of Highway 12 was monitored for subsidence during active mining. Eight subsidence monuments were established along the railroad tracks over the 3rd North Main. Monitoring of these points was conducted to demonstrate no appreciable subsidence over the 3rd North Main. Data collected indicated no evidence of subsidence, with an average movement of -.OS feet, which is within acceptable survey error. Areas north of the highway were monitored for both commencement and magnitude of subsidence due to longwall mining. Based on review of these data, vertical and horizontal changes due to longwall subsidence are nearly fully manifested within two years subsequent to mining, and a negligible amount of subsidence is typically measured after that period. Since mining south of Highway 12 occurred 7-8 years ago, it is likely that all subsidence impacts have materialized, and any further subsidence in this area will be insignificant. Due [o depth of cover, it is very unlikely that any additional subsidence would have a negative impact to the environment. Subsidence impacts observed have no appreciable effect on the land use of rangeland and wildlife habitat. Two areas of surface disturbance from the New Elk Mine have also been incorporated into the Golden Eagle permit area. (See also MR-79, New Elk Permit rYC-81-O12) These two areas are reclaimed ventilation shaft locations, both located in the Left Fork of Apache Canyon. These two 5