My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35945
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35945
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:42 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:32:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/16/1997
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN3
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Creek Basin. Of the total 140 acres of basin azea within the permit boundary, only about 24 acres <br />are disturbedby the mine. This azea is a small fraction of the total drainage area of 27.4 squaze miles <br />upstream of the mine on Oak Creek. Average annual yield from the mine area is estimated at 7,900 <br />acre-feet. Runoff from the permit area is estimated at 25 ac-ft, or 0.3 percent of the total annual <br />stream flow of Oak Creek above the mine. The estimated mean minimum flow is 5 cfs. <br />Seasonal runoff hydrographs for both streams show peak discharge occurring in April, May, and <br />June as a result of snowmelt runoff: Low flows in both streams begin in the late summer and extend <br />through the winter months until the onset of spring runoff. <br />A large portion of the permit azea has been previously mined, replacing consolidated overburden <br />with spoil materials. Deep percolation of precipitation through the spoils has created a water table <br />aquifer which abuts against the now buried highwall, or box cut, near the foot of the previously <br />mined slope. Numerous springs have formed as a result. These springs emanate along a relatively <br />steep slope above the alluvium on the east side of Trout Creek. <br />Water quality conditions upstream of the mine indicate that dissolved iron, manganese and other <br />tracemetalsallhaveoccasionallyexceededreceivingstreamstandazds. Baseline dataindicateminor <br />changes in water quality occur between upstream and downstream stations on both Trout and Oak <br />Creeks. This is probably due to the impacts of past mining activities. The baseline quality of the <br />water in Oak Creek is generally poorer than that in Trout Creek above the permit area because of the <br />extensive mining that has occurred in the Oak Creek drainage during the past century. <br />Land se <br />Current and historic land use in the vicinity of the operation has been coal mining, livestock grazing <br />and wildlife habitat. Historically, coal has been extracted from the mine azea by both surface strip <br />and underground methods. <br />Imgated cropland in the area is limited to portions of the Trout Creek alluvial body, and to the <br />Yampa River floodplain. Non-imgated crops are grown on sloping upland areas, as well as on some <br />alluvial bottom lands. No cropland will be disturbed by the mining operation. <br />T~soi I <br />Topsoil within the permit azea is discontinuous in the West and Center Ridge Areas, due to previous <br />surface mining operations. The operator has estimated that approximately nine inches of topsoil will <br />be replaced on 132 acres in the West Ridge Area. In the Moffat Area, approximately 375 acres of <br />reclaimed lands will be topsoiled to a depth of 9 inches. <br />Vegetation <br />Vegetation in the vicinity of the mine is characterized by three vegetative types; mixed brush, <br />Edna Mine 7 permit Renexal No. 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.