My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35869
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35869
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/14/2003
Doc Name
Amendment to Permit AM-01
From
BLC Development LLC
To
DMG EDO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BLC DEVELOPMENT, LLC <br />P.o. Box 7z <br />Lucerne, CO 80646 <br />(970)353-7055 <br />July 2, 2003 <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Director <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department ofNatural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Robert W. Cattany . <br />Division Director <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street; Room 215 , <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />R€GE11fEE~ <br />JUl 0 ~' 2003 <br />Division of Minerals aqd Z;eala9Y <br />Re:. Shores, Amendment to Pemrit No: M-199$-0.19; and a1T Subsequent Revisions <br />Gentlemen: <br />Hall-lrwin has demanded that we advise your office'of a technical correction to our letter dated June 12, <br />2003. Please be advised that <br />Pazagraph 4, page two should read as follows: <br />"Buyer shall obtain the written approval of such mining plan from the Seller, which approvals <br />Seller shall not unreasonably withheld. Seller's approval or disapproval. of the mining plan <br />shall be based on the criterion set forth above and once approved. Seller shall not further <br />challenge the minin¢ elan " <br />The substantive requirements of this section do not change in that Hall-Irwin must obtain BLC <br />Development's written approval of any Mitring- Plan. Of course, Hall-hwin did not advise BLC <br />Development that it was amending the Mitring Plan and certainly did not obtain its written approval. <br />Hall-Irwin also suggests that it has acknowledgements of receipt of certified mail from BLC <br />Development, LLC; however, Hall-Irvin has failed to provide copies. To our knowledge, we <br />receivediito such notice and our revie'iv of the files`of the Division of Mining and Geology did rut <br />reveal such certificates. BLC Development cannot state with certainty that notices were not dP~~ 1 <br />to"its offices; buf BLC Development is very skepfical of Hall-Irwin's statements. The abs~ ...tvered <br />..-nce of any <br />certificates in the Division of Mineral and Geology files and the fact that Hall-Irwin dick not even <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.