My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35743
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35743
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:35 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:26:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978116
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/15/2005
Doc Name
DMO-splp results review
From
harry posey
To
steve shuey russ means
Permit Index Doc Type
DMO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that pollutants will be diluted at least 19 times before reaching a stream (see aluminum, Table 1 ). For ore <br />piles, it should be demonstrated that contaminants will be diluted at least 50 times before reaching <br />groundwater (see selenium, Table 1). <br />I understand that the operator at the SM-18 mine already has constructed a small runoff retention feature <br />below the ore piles to establish some protection for groundwater. This pond should retain all of the runo <br />anticipated from some design storm: I would recommend at least the 100-year storm. If water in this <br />pond is meant to evaporate rather than leach slowly into groundwater, there should be measures in place <br />to prevent evaporite residues in the pond from becoming blowing dust. Land application of the fluids <br />maybe acceptable provided the permit is revised appropriately. <br />There is precedent in the Division allowing dilution of contaminants with fresh water or groundwater in <br />order to meet groundwater numeric protection levels. If dilution is selected as a means; of meeting <br />groundwater numeric protection levels, the operator should construct a model showing what dilution rates <br />can be expected if rain or snow melt drives pollutants from the rock piles into local groundwater. <br />Numeric protection levels may also need to be developed if high ambient levels are to be considered in <br />the dilution calculations. <br />The division should carefully evaluate the proximity of ore and waste rock piles to surface and <br />groundwater resources. This will require site-specific examinations that consider proximity to streams, <br />proximity to groundwater, size of ore and waste rock facilities, duration of their exposure to weathering, <br />and reclamation and closure techniques. <br />Discussion: The Synthetic Precipitation Leach Procedure (EPA Method 5W-846) requires adding 2 liters <br />of slightly acidified deionized water (initial pH = 4.2 using a mixture of HZSOa and HNO3 (sulfuric and <br />nitric acid) to 100 g of powdered sample, and agitating the mixture end-over-end at 302 rpm for 18 hours. <br />It is recognized that the SPLP is an aggressive test that tends to overstate the amount of pollutants that <br />may derive from a rock mass under natural conditions, unless their natural state is to be crushed as in the <br />SPLP. Test results for this study aze considered maxima that might be expected under worst-case <br />conditions. Although the test is chemically more aggressive than natural conditions might allow, the tests <br />do indicate what pazameters aze likely to appear under natural conditions. Operators may wish to focus <br />on these pazameters primarily to minimize the release of contaminants from their operations. <br />Overall, I believe the facilities need to examine their ore and waste handling procedures in context of <br />potential exposure to ground and surface water. <br />Cc: Bruce Humphries <br />Cazl Mount <br />Wally Erickson <br />Bob Oswald <br />Kate Pickford <br />Allen Sorenson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.