My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35604
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35604
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:31 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:23:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/21/1988
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN1
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• -17- <br />which 1te to the southeast of the Fire Mountain Canal including the area <br />mapped Qpc are found to meet criteria of alluvial valley floors. Alluvial <br />deposits located upslope (northwest) of the Fire Mountain Canal failed to meet <br />the water availability criteria, and so were given no further consideration. <br />The alluvial valley floor along the North Fork continues downstream, as shown <br />on Map 5-2. <br />The operator will be affecting 11.4 of the Terror Creek watershed. This area <br />and the ad,)acent Terror Creek were not considered 1n the Division's original <br />Alluvial Valley Floor determination August 20, 1981 but they were considered <br />for this permit revision of June 20, 1985. The operator did not identify any <br />areas along Terror Creek that contain significant bodies of alluvium. Most of <br />the deposits are colluvial in nature and confined to the immediate stream <br />channel. The Morrell Camp area contains primarily colluvial deposits and as <br />such does not meet the definition of alluvial valley floors. <br />East and West Roatcap Creek were also not determined to be alluvial valley <br />floors. The sediments are predominately colluvial 1n nature and are too small <br />to support agricultural activities. <br />In reviewing the original application, some concerns were raised over whether <br />CNI proposed to use augmentation water that would normally supply an AYF. CNI <br />responded by showing that Terror ditch and Nest Reservoir waters supply Garvin <br />• Mesa and an irrigated area known as 'the Basin', both of which are out of the <br />valley floor complex and are not alluvial valley floors. Therefore, CWI will <br />not be impacting an AVF as a result of augmentation mitigation. <br />Alluvial Valley Floors - Findings <br />` The applicant is eligible for exemption from the requirements of Section <br />34-33-114 (2 )(e)(II) of C.R.S. 1973 by virtue of having a permit issued prior <br />to August 3, 1977, This permit was a License to Mine, issued by the Colorado <br />Division of Mines on December 14, 1976. This was the only primary permit <br />required at the time by Colorado law to operate an underground coal mine. The <br />real extent of this exemption must be based upon a demonstration of financial <br />or regulatory commitment to mine prior to August 3, 1977. In this case, mine <br />maps submitted to the Division of Mines and information in the permit <br />application (see 'Ground Nater Investigation of 5teven's Gulch" in Yolume 4) <br />provide the appropriate financial or regulatory demonstration, Therefore, <br />both areas identified as alluvial valley floors in Steven's Gulch and along <br />the North For1c of the Gunnison River are exempt from the requirements of <br />Section 34-33-114 (2 )(e )(I ). The permit revision areas and the potential <br />alluvial valley floor in adJacent Terror Creek are not covered by the <br />grandfather provision, and will be discussed separately later. <br />Although exempted from Section 34-33-114(2)(e )(I ), the applicant must still <br />comply with Section 34-33-120 (2)(,))NI) for all activities which involve <br />surface operations or surface impacts incident to the underground portions of <br />the mine. To demonstrate compliance, the applicant must identify the <br />• essential hydrologic functions of an alluvial valley floor and submit a plan <br />demonstrating that the essential hydrologic functions can be preserved <br />throughout mining or restored after mining. <br />The essential hydrologic functions of the AVF along the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison are both flood irrigation and subirrigation, The lower levels of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.