Laserfiche WebLink
Jill-06-01 10:38AN FROlFOolar~do ~isian cf llinsr~ls i Gsoloiy +13038663567 • T-935 P.003/004 F-136 <br />~: • <br />3. The board failed to subpoena witnesses for which motions had bees made, <br />clearly violating objector's constitutioeal right to "due process of law". <br />Testimony from these witnesses was crucial to objector's arguments and <br />was particularly pertleent to proving objectors allegations that water quality <br />data used by the DMG was fabricated aed that the toxic effect of mercury <br />eMering Ure Dolores River from upstream sources (aelmorrledged b~ the DM6j <br />could be exacerbated by dowestream gravel mleing attirities. <br />4. Arguments and discussions by attorneys representing the board and the <br />Water Quality Control Dh`rislon concerning the failure to subpoena witnesses <br />and the admissibility of tertsin evidence used up a substantial portloe of <br />objector's Ilmited time allocatloe denylny objector a fair opportunity to <br />present argume~s on all of the issues. <br />Dated this Monday, laly 02, 2001 <br />W.~.~, <br />Darld B. uchert, Objector <br />26495 CR 38.5 <br />Dolores, CO 81323 <br />970-882-8081 <br />