My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35570
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:30 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:23:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/14/2005
Doc Name
Major Mod. UIC Area Permit No. CO30858-00000
From
EPA
To
American Soda LLP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed languase: <br />Cavity development shall be monitored to estimate cavity size. Because the leached solution cavity <br />will be a matrix of oil shale rather than a void, cavity size and shape must be determined by the <br />following indirect methods. Material balances of the volumetric fluid flow rates into and out of <br />the solution mining cavities shall be performed. Continuous monitoring of flow rates, <br />temperature, and fluid densities will moniter ongoing material balance, which will allow the <br />permittee to make calculations of the mass of nahcolite extracted. This information will be <br />submitted quarterly to EPA. A combination of TDR (in test well 20-12) and borehole geophysical <br />techniques shall be employed to evaluate subsurface movement and movement of strata overlying <br />the solution cavities (see Section 3.0, Subsurface Monitoring, Subsidence Monitorine Plan. <br />Appendix .n. The performance of the TDR monitoring will determine if TDR is incorporated into <br />the long-range monitoring program. If TDR proves to not be an adequate means of monitoring <br />subsurface movement, EPA may require other instrumentation techniques to be evaluated by the <br />permittee, and if any subsidence changes are significant EPA will be notified as specified by <br />Section III, E.10. TDR will be collected and reported quarterly for we1120-12. <br />A subsidence report shall be submitted to the EPA annually. The report will contain data from <br />surface monument measurements, TDR data, and borehole geophysical data. The annual <br />subsidence report shall also include a map of surface monument locations, locations of wells where <br />borehole geophysics were conducted, a list of monument and well coordinates, and a summary of <br />pertinent observations during the reporting period. <br />II. Infection Interval: BackEround and Proposed Modifications <br />The UIC permit currently stipulates that the injection zone must be a minimum of 150 feet below <br />the dissolution surface. The bottom of the injection zone is generally about 800 feet below the <br />dissolution surface for a total injection zone thickness of about 650 feet. The requirement to have 150 <br />feet between the dissolution surface and the injection zone is intended to isolate the lower aquifer from <br />the mining injection since there was considered to be some potential for hydrologic connection between <br />the dissolution aquifer and the overlying B-groove, A-groove, and Uinta aquifers. <br />The lower aquifer generally does not qualify as a USDW within the mining azea, however, upper <br />portions of the lower aquifer (upper LS and above) may constitute USDWs at other locations within the <br />basin. The upper aquifer system including the overlying B-groove, A-groove, and Uinta aquifers are <br />generally considered potential USDWs within the Piceance Basin. The R-6 zone below the B-groove <br />has been shown to be an aquitazd, effectively isolating the B-groove from the dissolution surface aquifer <br />at Natural Soda's adjacent sodium minerals lease. Evidence from American Soda's sodium minerals <br />lease also supports that the R-6 zone is an effective aquitazd. Previous pressurization of the dissolution <br />aquifer (increase of over 150 feet of head) did not result in pressurization at the B-groove. <br />There aze essentially two components relating to isolation of mining fluid from the overlying <br />aquifer systems. The first component is the mechanical integrity of the well bore and injection system. <br />The second component is geological integrity of the receiving formation. While American Soda tests <br />for mechanical integrity and can generally confirm the mechanical integrity of the injection system <br />through operational data, it cannot control the geologic integrity of the mining zone. Natural fractures in <br />the host rock have the potential to provide a pathway for mining fluid to reach the dissolution surface. <br />Fractures may self-heal as a function of the mining process but there is a potential for mining fluid to <br />Draft Addendum to SOB For Modification No. 9, UIC Area Permit No. CO30858-00000 Page 6 of17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.