My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35475
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35475
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:26 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:20:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/1/1983
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-24- <br />2 <br />Salt Loading <br />Sediment and flow control facilities such as sediment ponds and <br />diversion ditches which detain water will have the effect of increasing <br />the concentration of total dissolved solids in the water due to <br />evaporation. Hlso, any water pumped from the pits into surface <br />drainages to facilitate operations may contain relatively high levels of <br />dissolved salts. While this is difficult to quantify, the result nay be <br />to increase dissolved salt levels in streams draining the mine property. <br />Using data from Williams Uraw, the Division has made the following <br />estimate: <br />The average salt discharge of 172.3 grams per day tunes 62 <br />days gives an assumed annual salt discharge of 10.7 kilograms <br />per year from the Kerr mine plan area within Williams Draw. <br />Considering the respective amount of disturbed area tributary to <br />each of Bolton, Bush, Williams, Sudduth and Mann Draws, the total <br />amount of salt loading on receiving streams is estimated to be <br />about 78.7 kilograms per year. <br />This can be broken down into the amount of loading on each <br />individual stream: <br />Bolton Draw 9U.5 kilograms/yr. <br />Bush Draw 3.9 kg/yr <br />Williams Draw 10.7 kg/yr <br />Sudduth Draw 2.7 kg/yr <br />Mann Draw 16.1 Kg/yr <br />Canadian River 123.9 kg/yr <br />After reclamation is completed and the sediment ponds are removed, <br />salt loading should drop to natural levels. <br />3. Change in surface water ion balance <br />Data collected by the Kerr Coal Company indicates a change from a <br />calcium-bicarbonate type baseline water to a sodium-bicarbonate and <br />magnesium-sulfate type affected water. These changes, along with <br />the anticipated salt loading, could cause the water quality to be <br />somewhat less suitable for stock water or irrigation. SAR values <br />would be increased. <br />None of these changes, including salt loading, would be significant <br />enough to affect surface water usage. Surface water quality would <br />still be well below recommended stock water standards for total <br />dissolved solids (7000 mg/1). Affected surface waters, like the <br />baseline waters, would classify as medium salinity, low alkali <br />hazard irrigation waters. <br />Surface water chemistry should return to baseline conditions after <br />pH dewatering has ceased, the pits have been backfilled, graded, <br />and topsoiled, and sediment ponds are removed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.