My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35467
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35467
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:26 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:20:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1983058
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/10/1990
Doc Name
TWIN PINES STIPULATION STATUS C-83-058
From
MLRD
To
TWIN PINES INVESTMENT LTD
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DINISP ~~' <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St.. Room 215 <br />Denver. CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />Fn%.303 632-8106 <br />May 10, 1990 <br />Mr. Chris Reed <br />Twin Pines Investment Ltd. <br />P.O. Box 187 <br />Rock vale, Colorado 81244-0187 <br />RE: Twin Pines Stipulation Si:atus fC~83-058) <br />Dear Chris: <br />Jfi~~~-GU <br />',~~{J ....P <br />v''^ -`i. <br />/. <br />~ rE ]6 ~ <br />M:Fwme <br />Gorf^o' <br />Frpp F. Banta. <br />Dwisa~ Dnp~or <br />This letter is to clarify the status of the stipulations on the recently <br />renewed Twin Pines mine permit. As I explained to Larry White, the three <br />new stipulations are in the permit document because they had not yet been <br />addressed at the time the documents wef-e prepared. However, they were <br />addressed at the end of the renewal process and have been satisfied. <br />A copy of the application for modific~-ion of the mine's NPDES permit <br />(dated March 28, 1990) was received, s4tisfying stipulation No. 10. <br />k'e'numErr~'d ~ fl <br />Materials and data submitted to amend Sec. 2.05 addressed the issue of mine <br />water passing thrc~gh the bench sediment pond. The Division determined hase~: <br />on this data, that the pond is adequately sized so, stipulation No. 11 is <br />satisfied. RenJ~>`be;rd ro iz <br />Stipulation No. 12 was satisfied by revision of p. 75 to indicate that runcff <br />from topsoil stockpiles was contained by berms and vegetative cover. <br />RL 4JfnFjN`Pt~ ro (3 <br />Stipulation No. 3 remains from the original Findings document and will be <br />relevant should the operation decide to make beneficial use of the mine hater <br />discharge, <br />If you have any further questions, feel free. to contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~'~~~ ~~ <br />Larry P. Routten ~~g <br />Reclamation Specialist ,7.1°IZ <br />LPR/yjb <br />7024E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.