My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35449
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:25 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:20:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984063
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/14/1984
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-z7- <br />The Division finds that, pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(c), the proposed operation <br />will minimize effects to the prevailing hydrologic balance outside the permit <br />area. <br />Reference <br />Tremain, Carol M. 1983. Coal Bed Methane Potential of the Piceance Basin, <br />Colorado. Colorado Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, <br />Denver, Colorado 80203. Open - File Report 82-1. <br />Climatolo ical Information and Air Resources -- Rules 2.04 8 <br />2.05.4 2 h 2.05.6 1 and 4.17 <br />The sections of the permit application dealing with climatologicl information <br />and air resources have been reviewed by the Division. Climatological <br />information is presented on page 59 of the application. The air pollution <br />control plan and an initial Emissions Permit from the Colorado Department of <br />Health are contained in Appendix B of the application. The initial permit <br />allows for the crushing and screening of 200,000 tons of coal per year. <br />The proposed operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />XI. Topsoil -- Rules 2.04 9, 2.05.3(5), 2.05.4(2)(d) and 4.06 <br />Soils resource information is presented on pages 59 through 60 of the <br />application. Topsoil salvage is discussed on page 96A-D and topsoil <br />redistribution is discussed on page IOTA. <br />The soils along Harvey Gap are derived frdm the weathered Mesa Verde <br />sandstones and shales. Colluvial and alluvial deposition has resulted in deep <br />clayey to loamy soils along the tae slopes and valley bottom, with thin rocky <br />soils occurring on the steep valley sideslopes. Previous mining disturbance <br />(excavation, traffic and waste disposal) have altered the soils at the <br />Eastside Mine site. However, the applicant has conducted soil sampling in <br />areas to be redisturbed, and has identified areas where suitable soil occurs. <br />Approximately 4 feet of soil material will be salvaged in the proposed waste <br />disposal area, and approximately 2 feet will be salvaged in the proposed <br />office area. These sites occupy valley bottom and toe slope topographic <br />positions. The soils are primarily looms and clay, looms with pH between 7 <br />and 7.8., E.C. below 6umhos/cm, and SAR values below 9, indicating suitable <br />plant growth media.. Salvageable soil does not exist at the site of the <br />portals or the proposed coal yard expansion area due to the severity of <br />previous disturbance (in the case of the portals and mine yard) and the fact <br />that pre-disturbance soils were shallow and rocky due to the original valley <br />slope topographic position (coal storage expansion area). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.