My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35449
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:25 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:20:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984063
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/14/1984
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_21_ <br />The uppermost portal seeps are occurring along areas that are overlain by <br />burned coal zones. Due to the good quality characteristics of the water, it <br />is assumed that this seep is occurring due to contact of the burn zone with <br />water that is tributary to the Grass Ualley Reservoir and{or Harvey Gap <br />Drainage. This portal seep has been measured as 2 gpm. This yield is <br />equivalent to .0045 cfs or 3.23 ac ft/yr. This quantity compared to the 5,800 <br />ac ft storage capacity of the Grass Valley Reservoir is insignificant. <br />However, as the operation plan calls for this water to be consumptively used <br />by the applicant for dust suppression,~replacement of water or an augmentation <br />plan is required. This subject is further addressed by a stipulation in <br />Section VI - Water Rights and Replacement. <br />In summary, the level of salinity in the Harvey Gap surface water system is <br />not predicted to rise significantly during the critical irrigation season. <br />The level of TDS could rise in a worst case scenario during the non-irrigation <br />season. The alluvium directly recharged by the Harvey Gap surface water <br />system could experience a rise in TDS levels. However, due to the already <br />high level of TDS in the alluvium, this rise is not projected to diminish the <br />agricultural use of the alluvial water. <br />The potential for diminution or degradation of bedrock ground water in the <br />area from mining activities at Eastside is found to be negligible. This is <br />due to the small size of the mine, the lack of communication of the coal seam <br />with overlying and underlying beds due to interbedded shale layers, and the <br />lack of potential of any rock strata within the affected section to supply a <br />quality ground water resource. <br />Reference <br />McWhorter, D.B., 1980, Procedures for Predictive Analysis of Selected <br />Hydrologic Impacts of Surface Mining, Office of Research and Decelopment <br />USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio. <br />IX. Cumulative Hyddologic Impact Stu <br />-- Riilac -_nF_fiTl anri- 9~~ <br />This Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Study (CHIS) for the hydrologic basin of the <br />Eastside Mine has been prepared by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Division (CMLRD) pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(c). This CHIS assesses the <br />cumulative hydrologic impacts of all anticipated coal mining operations upon <br />the Colorado River Ualley in the vicinity of the Eastside Mine. Included in <br />this assessment are the proposed Eastside Mine and the proposed Coal Ridge No. <br />1 Mine. These mines are both located along, or in close proximity to, the <br />Colorado River. There are no other mines located in the general area, and <br />also, no other mines with impacts that have the potential to cumulatively add <br />to the effects of the Eastside and Coal Ridge No. 1 Mines to diminish or <br />degrade the hydrologic balance. The permit applications for these mines are <br />located at the offices of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division, and <br />are designated as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.