Laserfiche WebLink
-15- <br />The proposed mining operation would not materially damage the quantity <br />or qualit,~of _surface and round water which supply the alluvial valley <br />1• oor. Worst case projections o~ impact, ue o mim ng in3ic-~ <br />sa inity rising in Harvey Gap during the non-irrigation season from 755 <br />mgjl TOS to 1054 mgjl. A sample from a well in the Colorado River <br />alluvium had a TDS level of 760 mg/1. Any recharge from Harvey Gap <br />into the alluvium could slightly raise the level of salinity in the <br />AVF. This would only occur in those portions of the AVF is immediate <br />contact with Harvey Gap waters. As worst case predictions account for <br />the extreme conditions (see Section VIII, Probable Hydrologic <br />Consequences), no material damage to water quality or quantity is <br />expected. <br />3. The essential h drolo is function of the alluvial valle floor would be <br />~~r~~es-er~ved-. The critical characteristics of the designated a uvia <br />valor are the integrity of the present irrigation system and the <br />ability of the surface water system to Supply sufficient irrigation <br />water to farming activities on the alluvial valley floor. As discussed <br />previously, neither surface facilities nor underground workings will be <br />located on or beneath the AVF. Mine entries will be driven along <br />strike to the east, away from Harvey Gap Drainage. As a result, there <br />is no potential for depletion of flows in Harvey Gap Drainage (which is <br />the conduit for irrigation water from Grass Valley Reservoir to the <br />AVF). The integrity of the existing water supply and irrigation system <br />will be preserved. <br />Alluvial Valley Floor Monitoring <br />Monitoring as outlined in Section V of this document will be sufficient to <br />detect any potential for impact to the productivity of irrigated lands on the <br />AVF as a result of mining activity. Due to the low potential for impact, <br />monitoring is not warranted at this time. <br />VIII. Probable Hydrologic Consequences <br />The Eastside Mine is located in Garfield County, approximately 3.5 miles north <br />of Silt, Colorado. The proposed mine will affect 167 acres of non-federal <br />land during the life of mine, with 54 acres being affected during the <br />five-year permit term. This underground mining operation will result in 12 <br />acres of surface disturbance with the surface facilities and roads. <br />The mine is located in the Harvey Gap <br />area is very steep, with the elevation <br />the mine along the Grand Hogback doo <br />Slopes in the area range from 10% to 5C <br />incised north-south trending stream va <br />sandstone of the Grand Hogback. <br />Drainage. The topography in the mine <br />ranging from 7,846 feet to the east of <br />n to 6,350 feet at the portal area. <br />d. The Harvey Gap Drainage is a deeply <br />Iley, which cuts through the resistant <br />