My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35449
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:25 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:20:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984063
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/14/1984
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-15- <br />The proposed mining operation would not materially damage the quantity <br />or qualit,~of _surface and round water which supply the alluvial valley <br />1• oor. Worst case projections o~ impact, ue o mim ng in3ic-~ <br />sa inity rising in Harvey Gap during the non-irrigation season from 755 <br />mgjl TOS to 1054 mgjl. A sample from a well in the Colorado River <br />alluvium had a TDS level of 760 mg/1. Any recharge from Harvey Gap <br />into the alluvium could slightly raise the level of salinity in the <br />AVF. This would only occur in those portions of the AVF is immediate <br />contact with Harvey Gap waters. As worst case predictions account for <br />the extreme conditions (see Section VIII, Probable Hydrologic <br />Consequences), no material damage to water quality or quantity is <br />expected. <br />3. The essential h drolo is function of the alluvial valle floor would be <br />~~r~~es-er~ved-. The critical characteristics of the designated a uvia <br />valor are the integrity of the present irrigation system and the <br />ability of the surface water system to Supply sufficient irrigation <br />water to farming activities on the alluvial valley floor. As discussed <br />previously, neither surface facilities nor underground workings will be <br />located on or beneath the AVF. Mine entries will be driven along <br />strike to the east, away from Harvey Gap Drainage. As a result, there <br />is no potential for depletion of flows in Harvey Gap Drainage (which is <br />the conduit for irrigation water from Grass Valley Reservoir to the <br />AVF). The integrity of the existing water supply and irrigation system <br />will be preserved. <br />Alluvial Valley Floor Monitoring <br />Monitoring as outlined in Section V of this document will be sufficient to <br />detect any potential for impact to the productivity of irrigated lands on the <br />AVF as a result of mining activity. Due to the low potential for impact, <br />monitoring is not warranted at this time. <br />VIII. Probable Hydrologic Consequences <br />The Eastside Mine is located in Garfield County, approximately 3.5 miles north <br />of Silt, Colorado. The proposed mine will affect 167 acres of non-federal <br />land during the life of mine, with 54 acres being affected during the <br />five-year permit term. This underground mining operation will result in 12 <br />acres of surface disturbance with the surface facilities and roads. <br />The mine is located in the Harvey Gap <br />area is very steep, with the elevation <br />the mine along the Grand Hogback doo <br />Slopes in the area range from 10% to 5C <br />incised north-south trending stream va <br />sandstone of the Grand Hogback. <br />Drainage. The topography in the mine <br />ranging from 7,846 feet to the east of <br />n to 6,350 feet at the portal area. <br />d. The Harvey Gap Drainage is a deeply <br />Iley, which cuts through the resistant <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.