My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35418
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:24 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:19:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/26/2007
Doc Name
Mountain Coal Possible NOV Information
From
DIH
To
TAK
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br />Hernandez, Daniel <br />From: Hernandez, Dan <br />Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 1:20 PM <br />To: Kaldenbach. Tom <br />Cc: Berry, David <br />Subject: Mountain Coal NOV <br />Tom -Based upon the information received last Friday from Doug Nolte and Henry Barbe with Mountain Coal Company, and <br />based upon the fact that we received an acceptable bond rider in the amount of $2 million last Friday and the required <br />signatures for the rider today, I have decided that we should not write a Notice of Violation to the company for beginning <br />installation of an exhaust fan on Shaft No. 3 prior to receipt of that rider. <br />It seems that when we verbally informed the company on Feb 20, 2007 that MR-337 (pertaining to the installation of the exhaust <br />fan on the pre-existing Shaft No. 3) had been approved that day, the company took that to mean that they could begin work on <br />the fan. According to both Doug and Henry, they were not aware that the $24,279 in reclamation bond that we had calculated <br />for the demolition of the exhaust fan had to first be submitted and approved. <br />The company additionally provided plausible information in their letter of last Friday regarding the need to provide ventilation for <br />mine workers quickly, and the need to begin work when they did due to a scarcity of contractors in the area that created a short <br />period of time within which work on the airshaft could begin. Finally, it is my understanding that the work occurred on land that <br />was previously approved for disturbance and that lies within an approved sediment control system. Therefore, adverse effects <br />upon the environment as a result of the work on the exhaust fan appear non-existent. <br />I have already informed Henry Barbe by telephone of my decision. I will send a letter to the company to this effect tomorrow. <br />Thanks for bringing this matter to my attention. <br />Dan <br />3/29/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.