My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35373
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35373
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:23 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:18:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/16/1993
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE INSPECTION CITIZENS COMPLAINT MT GUNNISON 1 MINE PN C-80-007
From
DMG
To
JIM PENDLETON
Permit Index Doc Type
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~; <br />Memo to Christine Johnston <br />Mt. Gunnison No. 1 Subsidence Inspection <br />page 3 <br />identified. ~t@n~-the-less the probabY2- hydrologic"consequences <br />(PHC) statement and the subsidence inventory statement of the <br />~rmi.t will now have to be amended by West Elk Coal. In addition <br />~i S~lieve it would be appropriate for W2st Elk to add the spring to. <br />~hei~ hydrologie monitoring plan-'. <br />It has been shown in the case of both the Mt. Gunnison No. 1 and <br />the Orchard Valley mines, that ground water wells impacted by <br />subsidence of underlying mine workings tend to initially dewater <br />and subsequently return to their pre-subsidence water levels within <br />a year or two. While we have no documented observations regarding <br />subsidence impact upon springs, I would anticipate a similar <br />scenario. The spring might relocate to a lower location <br />stratigraphically. However, I would expect the flow to reestablish <br />within a year or two. ~t appears that this spring has followed <br />c#1~ scenario: I would also anticipate that West Elk Coal's <br />undermining within the "B" Seam may have a similar impact. I would <br />anticipate that the impact might be muted by the additional 430' of <br />overburden thickness. I also expect that the spring flow might <br />continue to recover for the next year and then decline as the "B" <br />Seam subsidence occurs. I would not be surprised if the spring <br />relocated itself once again to a lower stratigraphic horizon. <br />Monitoring of the spring should allow careful determination of the <br />impacts of undermining. <br />Mr. Mautz seemed genuinely relieved to discover that the spring <br />flow had reinitiated. He stated that his primary desire was to <br />have a sufficient water supply to rehabilitate his historic <br />domestic use of the homestead cabin site. I recommend that we <br />encourage Mr. Mautz and West Elk Coal to negotiate an agreement to <br />address the protection of Mr. Mautz's decreed water right. Mr. <br />Barbe reported that he would present his observations to his <br />management for consideration. Failing an amicable agreement within <br />a reasonable time period, perhaps several months, we should require <br />the operator to propose a plan for the monitoring and protection of <br />Mr. Mautz's water right. <br />I further recommend that you include these observations in your <br />inspection report. If you prefer you may attach a copy of this <br />memorandum. In addition, copies of all correspondence dealing with <br />this topic should be provided to Mr. Mautz. <br />cc: David Berry <br />Steve Renner <br />DoC: M:\MIN\JAP\MTGSUB.MEM <br />JP/]P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.