My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35269
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35269
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:16:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/16/1992
Doc Name
COAL STORAGE SILOS & OVERHEAD CONVEYORS HAWKS NEST MINE OLIVER SITE GUNNISON COUNTY CO
From
ARCO COAL CO
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARCO Coal Company <br />.3 Sever.teanth Street <br />Lenver. Colorado 30202 <br />Taleohone 303 293 :000 <br />July ls, lssz <br />Mr. Tom D. Gillis <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />State of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CU 80'l03 <br /> <br />JUL 161992 <br />MINE AILS IUN OF <br />~ ~EOLOGv <br />Re: Coal Storage Silos & Overhead Conveyors <br />Hawks Nest Mine -Oliver Site <br />Gunnison County, CO <br />Dear Mr. Gillis: <br />Late last month I advised you Mountain Coal Company had <br />acquired the two concrete silos and overhead conveyor from the <br />Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad. The purchase of these <br />facilities was included with other transactions we recently <br />completed with the railroad. <br />Our West Elk Mine currently has no plans to use the structures. <br />However, we would like to be notified when the MLRD has firmed <br />up a reclamation schedule that would include demolition of these <br />facilities. We would also appreciate as much advance notice as <br />possible so we can make an updated assessment of our coal <br />storage artd loading needs for West Elk. If, at that time, we can <br />justify a foreseeable need for these structures, we would then <br />like to discuss with the MLRD the retention and re-permitting of <br />the structures by Mountain Coal Company. <br />One suggestion was contained in my letter to you of November <br />1?, 1991, that discussed an escrow arrangement for MLRD funds <br />which could be used at a future date. An alternative, suggested <br />by you, assuming the structures can be refurbished and actually <br />put to use by West Elk, was for the MLRD to complete its <br />reclamation except to leave these structures intact. This would <br />establish a good environmental baseline upon which a new permit <br />could be considered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.