My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:18 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:14:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/4/1981
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
mine plan area to White River, increased sediment loads from disturbed areas, <br />and water quality degradation from the Refuse Disposal area. Long term impacts <br />will center on the effects of subsidence under Scullion Gulch and Red Wash. <br />See the Subsidence section of this TEA for further discussion of subsidence <br />impacts. <br />Short term surface water loss will occur as a result of two things: retention <br />of water in ponds and removal of water fran the White River alluvium by the <br />well field. Runoff from disturbed areas will be routed through sedimentation <br />ponds, thereby reducing the amount of flow to the White River. Evaporation <br />losses will occur because the ponds will not discharge run-off until some of <br />the available storage volume is filled. The impounded water may, however, <br />percolate through the reservoir to re-enter the ground water and surface water <br />systems. Losses from the D-portal pond will be insignificant when compared to <br />total run-off from the Scullion Gulch watershed. The pond is designed to store <br />run-off from 44 acres while Scullion Gulch has a contributing drainage area of <br />7,552 acres at its confluence with the White River. The Refuse Disposal area <br />ponds receive run-off from approximately 98 acres, which is a very small <br />portion of the 2,950 acres drained by the Red Wash tributary through the <br />northern sector of the permit area. Based on this information, the net loss of <br />surface water quantity to Red Wash and White River will be negligible. <br />The water supply for the mine will come from the White River at a withdrawal <br />rate of 1.34 cubic feet per second. This translates to 0.2 percent of the <br />average annual flow in the river of 672 cfs. Even during low flow conditions, <br />when the average flow is 245 cfs, the withdrawal rate will only be 0.55 percent <br />of the available flow. Therefore, adverse impacts on flow in the White River <br />as a result of proposed withdrawal should be minimal. Furthermore, the <br />applicant has secured water rights downstream of the mine that may be used if <br />necessary to replace a depleted water source. <br />Construction of surface facilities in the permit area will cause temporary in- <br />creases in the amount of suspended solids in the surface water system. Fur- <br />thermore, concentrations of chemicals associated with increased sediment load, <br />such as iron and manganese, will also increase. At the Deserado Mine, mitiga- <br />tion of sediment load will be accomplished primarily by sedimentation ponds. <br />Although sediment increases will occur in the early phases of construction, the <br />long-term sediment yield may actually decrease below the already high natural <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.