My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:18 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:14:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/4/1981
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
placed in the channel of Scullion fulrh and ;+s rr;hurarie~ to act as sediment <br />control measures while the D-Portal area is being reclaimed. The dams have a <br />combined storage capacity of 1_.74 acre feet, which is adeciuate for the .51 acre <br />feet of_sedimeni`,~hla~_,w.i. umulate over a_three year period. Each dam is <br />three toYfive feet high with side slopes of 1.5h:1v. An overflow spillway, <br />consisting of a trapezoidal channel with a four foot bottom width, 1.5h:1v side <br />slopes and a one foot depth, will be constructed in the dam. Additionally, <br />sediment control measures will be implemented in the D-Portal Area to mitigate <br />the effects of erosion on surface water flow in Scullion Gulch. These include <br />contour furrowing and anchored jute netting to retain mulch on slopes of 3h:ly <br />or greater. <br />The D-Portal Area comprises only 0.6 percent of the entire Scullion Gulch <br />drainage basin. The 7.74 square miles above the D-Portal area will contribute <br />6.02 acre feet of sediment over a three year period 'as compared with the .51 <br />acre feet expected for the D-Portal Area itself. The applicant has not speci- <br />fied the longevity or maintenance of these dams. Obviously, the available <br />storage is not sufficient to contain all the sediment from the upstream drain- <br />age area, and the dams will theoretically fill with sediment within a year. <br />Although this is a good faith effort to provide sediment control, the size of <br />the problem does not warrant the construction of thirteen rocks check dams. To <br />provide sediment control in this manner will certainly cause the channel to de- <br />stabilize at some time unless the dams are cleaned out frequently. Further- <br />more, the amount of sediment involved is negligible, the reclaimed D-Portal <br />would contribute only 9.3 percent of the sediment load to Scullion Gulch if the <br />check dams were not installed (page V-22a of the permit application). T~e- <br />fore it is recommended that the applicant omit from *na n_anrr ~l rnr lama };nn <br />plan all the rock check dams in the main channel and tributaries of Scullion <br />~y]Sh with the exception of three dams or sediment traps, built to SCS or U.S. <br />Forest Service specifications, to be installed at the downstream limit of the <br />D-Portal Area. These s uTa provide sufficient storage to store one year of <br />sediment accumulation from the D-Portal area. The traps will be constructed <br />prior to the onset of reclamation, cleaned periodically throughout the reclama- <br />tion period until the appropriate regulatory authority has deemed reclamation <br />complete, at which time the controls will be removed. (See "Stipulations" in <br />this section of the TEA). <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.