GENERAL35038 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

8 substrate. Cultural material is mixed through the 30 cm of recent fill, a medium- to dark-brown blocky clay loam. Including the single flake from ST-23, 14 items were recovered including two small biface fragments, a tiny flake graver, end 11 flakes. Level counts run: 0 to 10 cm - 6; 10 to 20 cm -4; 20 to 30 cm - 3; shovel probe - 1. Both bifaces appear to be pieces of arrowhead-sized tools, but are too fragmentary to be diagnostic. One is illustrated as Figure 4a. The graver is a small beak formed by minimal retouch of white chert flake fragment (Figure 4bj. The flakes include translucent-to-opaque clearish-to-white chert except for one flake of siltstone. Flake types include small retouch and bifacial thinning flakes as well as a small piece of shatter. Test Pit 2 was placed more central in the shrubby area; also near positive probes, and adjacent the heaviest concentration of surface materials. Like Test Pit 1, the unit was excavated to the contact with a massive yellow-brown clay at about 30 cm below the present surface. This unit yielded 14 flakes and a small, finely-worked spokeshave which displays two worked concavities (Figure 4c). It is made of a milky white translucent chert. The flakes are small and include light-colored cherts as well as several pieces of dark gray chert. Flake types include several retouch and bifacial thinning flakes, several flake fragments and two small pieces of debris. Level counts are: 0 to 10 cm - 6; l0 to 20 cm-4; and 20 to 30 cm-5. Also notable in the unit was some charcoal staining and some very small charcoal flecks. These became noticeable at 20 curbs and more noticeable at 25 curbs, but the stained area was only slightly darker than surrounding fill and had no clear definition. Nevertheless, the stain was valuable because it provided potential to date the upper soil unit. It appeared that the darker topsoil overlies a much older clay, and dating the disconformity between the units could aid in interpreting the cultural events on the site. A soil sample was taken of the darkest dirt at the clay contact and submitted to Beta Analytic for dating. The results read 1590 + 80 (Beta- ~ ~OOj. ,This date is believed to relate, more or less, to the~time the upper s''IflSif'"!' ~ accumulate . Locus A does have an area, measuring about 15 m E-W by 4 m N-S where cultural materials are contained in a 30 cm deep accumulation of soil. There is no good level definition, little preserved natural stratigraphy, and, judging from the dispersed nature of the soil stain - both vertically and horizontally - features are not intact. The deposit appears to be highly burrowed by rodents and badgers and the fill appears "homogenized." Further, most of the Level 3 flakes from both units appeared to rest on the clay contact - an indication of pre-depositional deflation. Although cultural material was derived from the deposit, it appears too mixed to be a reliable data source for additional research questions. The date of almost 1600 BP seems reasonable for most of the cultural material in view of the arrowhead-sized biface fragments, but in the absence of clear stratigraphy, there is no way of knowing how many use episodes are contained in the deposit.